Amifostine as a protector against cisplatin-induced toxicity in nude mice
- PMID: 10227448
- DOI: 10.1080/028418699431681
Amifostine as a protector against cisplatin-induced toxicity in nude mice
Abstract
The mechanisms mediating the protective effects of amifostine on cisplatin-induced toxicity were investigated in tumor-bearing nude mice by quantitative immunohistochemistry for analysis of cisplatin-DNA adduct levels in tumors and kidneys. The mice were treated with cisplatin 5 or 10 mg/kg i.p. with or without amifostine 200 mg/kg 30 min prior to cisplatin. Toxicity was noted in terms of mortality and changes in body weight. Mortality was similar in the four treatment groups, regardless of cisplatin dose or whether amifostine was added or not. At a cisplatin dose of 5 mg/kg, amifostine did not affect the moderate decrease in body weight. Cisplatin 10 mg/kg alone gave a significant loss of body weight, with the nadir on day 7. By adding amifostine to 10 mg/kg cisplatin the weight loss was much less pronounced. Tumor growth was significantly more retarded among animals treated with 10 mg/kg cisplatin alone compared with amifostine + cisplatin 10 mg/kg. There was no difference in tumor growth retardation between cisplatin 5 mg/kg alone or in combination with amifostine. The most likely explanation was that the pronounced tumor growth retardation with 10 mg/kg cisplatin alone was due to the decline in the general condition of the animals rather than increased antitumoral activity per se. Analysis of cisplatin-DNA adducts in tumors showed no difference whether cisplatin 10 mg/kg was combined with amifostine or not. In kidneys there were significantly fewer tubular cells with very high adduct levels in animals pretreated with amifostine.
Similar articles
-
Effects of amifostine on cisplatin induced DNA adduct formation and toxicity in malignant glioma and normal tissues in rat.J Neurooncol. 1999 Mar;42(1):13-21. doi: 10.1023/a:1006152103476. J Neurooncol. 1999. PMID: 10360475
-
Time dependent protection of amifostine from renal and hematopoietic cisplatin induced toxicity.Life Sci. 2005 Mar 4;76(16):1825-34. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2004.09.028. Epub 2005 Jan 28. Life Sci. 2005. PMID: 15698860
-
BNP7787, a novel protector against platinum-related toxicities, does not affect the efficacy of cisplatin or carboplatin in human tumour xenografts.Eur J Cancer. 2002 May;38(8):1148-56. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(02)00036-9. Eur J Cancer. 2002. PMID: 12008205
-
Amifostine reduces the incidence of cumulative nephrotoxicity from cisplatin: laboratory and clinical aspects.Semin Oncol. 1999 Apr;26(2 Suppl 7):72-81. Semin Oncol. 1999. PMID: 10348264 Review.
-
Amifostine (Ethyol): pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects in vivo.Eur J Cancer. 1996;32A Suppl 4:S26-30. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(96)00332-2. Eur J Cancer. 1996. PMID: 8976819 Review.
Cited by
-
30-hydroxygambogic acid increases the efficacy of cisplatin in an HPV+ head and neck cancer in vivo model.BMC Cancer. 2025 Aug 1;25(1):1251. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14638-3. BMC Cancer. 2025. PMID: 40745291 Free PMC article.
-
Metabolic interaction between amino acid deprivation and cisplatin synergistically reduces phosphoribosyl-pyrophosphate and augments cisplatin cytotoxicity.Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 16;10(1):19907. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76958-7. Sci Rep. 2020. PMID: 33199755 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources