How expensive are unlimited substance abuse benefits under managed care?
- PMID: 10230147
- DOI: 10.1007/BF02287491
How expensive are unlimited substance abuse benefits under managed care?
Abstract
Substance abuse (SA) care has been excluded from recent federal and state legislation mandating equal benefits for mental health and medical care ("parity"), largely because of cost concerns. This article studies how many patients are affected by SA coverage limits and the likely implications of limits on insurance payments, using 1996-97 claims from 25 managed care plans with unlimited SA benefits. Changing even stringent limits on annual SA benefits has a small absolute effect on overall insurance costs under managed care, even though a large percentage of SA patients are affected. Removing an annual limit of $10,000 per year on SA care is estimated to increase insurance payments by about 6 cents per member per year, removing a limit of $1,000 increases payments by about $3.40. As long as care is comprehensively managed, "parity" for SA in employer-sponsored health plans is not very costly.
Similar articles
-
Costs and utilization of substance abuse care in a privately insured population under managed care.Psychiatr Serv. 1998 Dec;49(12):1573-8. doi: 10.1176/ps.49.12.1573. Psychiatr Serv. 1998. PMID: 9856619
-
Mental health and substance abuse insurance parity for federal employees: how did health plans respond?J Policy Anal Manage. 2008 Winter;27(1):155-70. doi: 10.1002/pam.20311. J Policy Anal Manage. 2008. PMID: 18478666
-
How expensive is unlimited mental health care coverage under managed care?JAMA. 1997 Nov 12;278(18):1533-7. JAMA. 1997. PMID: 9363977
-
Legislations and policies to expand mental health and substance abuse benefits in health insurance plans: a community guide systematic economic review.J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2015 Mar;18(1):39-48. J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2015. PMID: 25862203 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Mental health and substance abuse benefits in carve-out plans and the Mental Health Parity Act of 1996.J Health Care Finance. 1998 Spring;24(3):82-92. J Health Care Finance. 1998. PMID: 9502060 Review.
Cited by
-
The sensitivity of substance abuse treatment intensity to co-payment levels.J Behav Health Serv Res. 2004 Jan-Mar;31(1):50-65. doi: 10.1007/BF02287338. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2004. PMID: 14722480
-
Evaluating selection out of health plans for Medicaid beneficiaries with substance abuse.J Behav Health Serv Res. 2003 Jan-Feb;30(1):78-92. doi: 10.1007/BF02287814. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2003. PMID: 12633005
-
The effects of federal parity on substance use disorder treatment.Am J Manag Care. 2014;20(1):76-82. Am J Manag Care. 2014. PMID: 24512166 Free PMC article.
-
Tracking changes in behavioral health services: how have carve-outs changed care?J Behav Health Serv Res. 1999 Nov;26(4):360-71. doi: 10.1007/BF02287297. J Behav Health Serv Res. 1999. PMID: 10565097 Review.
-
Benefit limits for behavioral health care in private health plans.Adm Policy Ment Health. 2009 Jan;36(1):15-23. doi: 10.1007/s10488-008-0196-5. Epub 2008 Nov 27. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2009. PMID: 19037721 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials