Anal ultrasound predicts the response to nonoperative treatment of fecal incontinence in men
- PMID: 10235533
- PMCID: PMC1420819
- DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199905000-00017
Anal ultrasound predicts the response to nonoperative treatment of fecal incontinence in men
Abstract
Objective: To assess the etiology, treatment, and utility of anal ultrasound in men with fecal incontinence and to review the outcomes of conservative (nonoperative) treatment.
Summary background data: The etiology of fecal incontinence in women is almost exclusively from obstetric or iatrogenic surgical injuries resulting in damage to the anal sphincters and/or pudendal nerves. Corresponding data on men with fecal incontinence are sparse.
Methods: Between January 1995 and January 1998, 37 men with fecal incontinence were evaluated in the John Radcliffe Hospital anorectal ultrasound unit. Their clinical histories, anal ultrasound results, anorectal physiology studies, and responses to conservative therapy were reviewed.
Results: Median age was 57 years. Major incontinence was present in 27% of the patients. Anal ultrasound localized anal sphincter damage in nine patients, and the characteristics of these nine patients with sphincter damage were then compared with the remaining 28 without sphincter damage. Prior anal surgery was more common in patients with sphincter damage. Hemorrhoids were more common in patients without sphincter damage. Anorectal physiology studies revealed significantly lower mean maximum resting and squeeze pressures in patients with sphincter damage, confirming poor sphincter function. With 92% follow-up, patients without sphincter damage were more likely to improve with nonoperative therapy.
Conclusions: Anal ultrasound is extremely useful in the evaluation of fecal incontinence in men. Unlike women, the majority of men do not have a sphincter defect by anal ultrasound, and conservative management is usually successful in these patients. In contrast, in men with anal sphincter damage, almost all of these defects resulted from previous anal surgery. Conservative management rarely is successful in these cases, and surgical repair of the anal sphincter may be indicated. Therefore, because the presence or absence of sphincter damage on anal ultrasound usually predicts the response to nonoperative treatment, anal ultrasound should be used to guide the initial management of men with fecal incontinence.
Similar articles
-
Usefulness of anorectal and endovaginal 3D ultrasound in the evaluation of sphincter and pubovisceral muscle defects using a new scoring system in women with fecal incontinence after vaginal delivery.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Apr;32(4):499-507. doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2750-z. Epub 2016 Dec 29. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017. PMID: 28035460
-
Pubovisceral muscle and anal sphincter defects in women with fecal or urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery.Tech Coloproctol. 2019 Feb;23(2):117-128. doi: 10.1007/s10151-018-1895-x. Epub 2018 Nov 26. Tech Coloproctol. 2019. PMID: 30478651
-
Long-term function and morphology of the anal sphincters and the pelvic floor after primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injury.Colorectal Dis. 2014 Oct;16(10):O347-55. doi: 10.1111/codi.12579. Colorectal Dis. 2014. PMID: 24502361
-
Fecal incontinence. Studies on physiology, pathophysiology and surgical treatment.Dan Med Bull. 2003 Aug;50(3):262-82. Dan Med Bull. 2003. PMID: 13677243 Review.
-
Pathophysiology of adult fecal incontinence.Gastroenterology. 2004 Jan;126(1 Suppl 1):S14-22. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2003.10.013. Gastroenterology. 2004. PMID: 14978634 Review.
Cited by
-
What Is Fecal Incontinence That Urologists Need to Know?Int Neurourol J. 2021 Mar;25(1):23-33. doi: 10.5213/inj.2040240.120. Epub 2021 Jan 19. Int Neurourol J. 2021. PMID: 33504128 Free PMC article.
-
Functional Anorectal Disorders.Gastroenterology. 2016 Mar 25:S0016-5085(16)00175-X 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.009. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.009. Online ahead of print. Gastroenterology. 2016. PMID: 27144630 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of anal incontinence: minimal approach, maximal effectiveness.Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2005 Feb;18(1):9-16. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-864076. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2005. PMID: 20011334 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Enck P, Bielefedt K, Rathmann W, Purrman J, Tschope D, Erckenbrecht JF. Epidemiology of faecal incontinence in selected patient groups. Int J Colorectal Dis 1991; 6: 143–146. - PubMed
-
- Nelson R, Norton N, Cautley E, Furner S. Community-based prevalence of anal incontinence. JAMA 1995; 274: 559–561. - PubMed
-
- Law PJ, Kamm MA, Bartram CI. Anal endosonography in the investigation of faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 1991; 78: 312–314. - PubMed
-
- Snooks SJ, Swash M, Henry MM, Setchell M. Effect of vaginal delivery on the pelvic floor: a five-year follow-up. Br J Surg 1990; 77: 1358–1360. - PubMed
-
- Drossman DA, Li Z, Andruzzi E, et al. US householder survey of functional GI disorders: prevalences, sociodemography, and health impact. Dig Dis Sci 1993; 38: 1569–1580. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources