Boophilus microplus: cellular responses to larval attachment and their relationship to host resistance
- PMID: 1023863
- DOI: 10.1071/bi9760499
Boophilus microplus: cellular responses to larval attachment and their relationship to host resistance
Abstract
The histology of early feeding lesions of the cattle tick B. microplus has been studied using 32P labelled larvae to standardize the duration of attachment. Critical studies were made on 3-h lesions in six separate experiments on different groups of British breed animals. Each group consisted of three animals--one previously unexposed to ticks, one of high resistance and one of low resistance. The degree of mast cell disruption, eosinophil concentration and degranulation, and the extent of epidermal vesiculation were all significantly greater at the site of attachment on highly resistant hosts. In previously unexposed animals there was no mobilization of eosinophils nor mast cell breakdown and no epidermal vesiculation. Possible immune mechanisms producing mast cell disruption and the infiltration and concentration of eosinophils are suggested, and the effect of eosinophil degranulation on larval attachment and feeding is discussed.
Similar articles
-
Kinetics of mast cell, basophil and eosinophil populations at Hyalomma anatolicum anatolicum feeding sites on cattle and the acquisition of resistance.Parasitology. 1986 Oct;93 ( Pt 2):305-15. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000051477. Parasitology. 1986. PMID: 3785971
-
Immune and biochemical responses in skin differ between bovine hosts genetically susceptible and resistant to the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus.Parasit Vectors. 2017 Jan 31;10(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s13071-016-1945-z. Parasit Vectors. 2017. PMID: 28143523 Free PMC article.
-
Boophilus microplus: the effect of host resistance on larval attachments and growth.Parasitology. 1976 Aug;73(1):123-36. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000051386. Parasitology. 1976. PMID: 987568
-
Host resistance in cattle to infestation with the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus.Parasite Immunol. 2014 Nov;36(11):553-9. doi: 10.1111/pim.12140. Parasite Immunol. 2014. PMID: 25313455 Review.
-
Genetic resistance of hosts and its influence on epidemiology.Vet Parasitol. 1989 Jul 1;32(1):21-35. doi: 10.1016/0304-4017(89)90153-2. Vet Parasitol. 1989. PMID: 2669317 Review.
Cited by
-
Mechanisms of eosinophilia in mice infested with larval Haemaphysalis longicornis ticks.Immunology. 1995 Mar;84(3):469-75. Immunology. 1995. PMID: 7751032 Free PMC article.
-
Expression network analysis of bovine skin infested with Rhipicephalus australis identifies pro-inflammatory genes contributing to tick susceptibility.Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 23;14(1):4419. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54577-w. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38388834 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of cutaneous hyperemia in cattle elicited by larvae of Boophilus microplus and by prostaglandins and other mediators.Experientia. 1983 Jul 15;39(7):725-7. doi: 10.1007/BF01990293. Experientia. 1983. PMID: 6861956
-
A putative role for eosinophils in tick rejection.Experientia. 1981 Jan 15;37(1):49-50. doi: 10.1007/BF01965562. Experientia. 1981. PMID: 7202667
-
Acquired tick resistance: The trail is hot.Parasite Immunol. 2021 May;43(5):e12808. doi: 10.1111/pim.12808. Epub 2020 Dec 15. Parasite Immunol. 2021. PMID: 33187012 Free PMC article. Review.