Values and CPR decisions: a comparison of physicians and administrators in training

Abstract

A report of a study to analyze the effect of sociocultural patient characteristics (age, terminal diseases, drug abuse, alcoholism, mental retardation, dementia, suicide attempts, institutionalization, noncompliance with medical regimens, violent crimes, lack of support system, or relationship to a staff physician) on decisions to initiate or withhold cardiopulmonary resuscitation in an emergency situation. Pairs of vignettes were presented to residents in internal medicine and graduate students in an MBA program for comparisons of physicians' decisions with administrators' decisions. On some patient characteristics there were significant differences between the two groups. For most factors (drug abuse, multiple suicide attempts, age, violent crime, lack of known support systems, and relationship to staff), doctors are more likely to initiate CPR than are business students representing health care administrators. In chronic, long-term situations (carcinoma or heart disease, dementia, mental retardation, and institutionalization), the doctors are less likely to initiate CPR than the business students. If objectivity is a goal in deciding whether or not to initiate CPR, physicians should be aware of differences between their opinions and others'.