Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1980 Winter;1(3):91-9.

Risk differential between Medicare beneficiaries enrolled and not enrolled in an HMO

Comparative Study

Risk differential between Medicare beneficiaries enrolled and not enrolled in an HMO

P Eggers. Health Care Financ Rev. 1980 Winter.

Abstract

Medicare provides incentive reimbursements to health maintenance organizations (HMOs) which enroll Medicare beneficiaries on a risk option and provide care at a lower cost than expected. The incentive reimbursements are tied to an actuarial calculation of Medicare Adjusted Average Per Capita Cost (AAPCC). The AAPCC adjusts for a number of variables which affect Medicare reimbursements and for which data are available: place of residence, age, sex, welfare status, and institutional status of beneficiaries. These factors account for much of the expected difference in health care reimbursements. They do not, however, account for differences in health status. Because of this, AAPCC calculations of expected costs may be too high if a selected group of beneficiaries is healthier than average, or too low if the selected group has a poorer health status than average. This case study examines the utilization behavior and reimbursement experience of a group of Medicare beneficiaries prior to their joining an HMO (during an open enrollment period) under a risk-sharing option. Their use was compared with a comparable Medicare population (the comparison group) to determine if their usage rates were greater, equal, or less than average. Results show that beneficiaries who joined during open enrollment had a rate of hospital inpatient use over 50 percent below the comparison group and a reimbursement rate for inpatient services 47 percent below the comparison group. These beneficiaries' use of Part B services also appears to be lower than the comparison group. These results must be interpreted with care. The information came from a single case study. Specific aspects of the open enrollment process, described in the paper, further limit the general liability of the findings. Also, while some studies of the same subject support the results, many others do not.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Berki SE, et al. Enrollment Choice in a Multi-HMO Setting. The Roles of Health Risk, Financial Vulnerability and Access to Care. Medical Care. 1977 Feb;15:95–114. - PubMed
    1. Brice Thomas. Risk Vulnerability and Enrollment in a Prepaid Group Practice. Medical Care. 1975 Aug;13:698–703. - PubMed
    1. Gornick M. Ten Years of Medicare: Impact on the Current Population. Social Security Bulletin. 1976 Jul;
    1. Luba David, Lave Judith. An Analysis of the Choice of Health Benefits by University Employees. Inquiry to be published in.
    1. Luft Harold. Methodology and the Self-Selection Problem. Health Maintenance Organizations to be published as a chapter in.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources