Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1986 Nov;31(11):1086-91.

Contamination of a multiple-use suction catheter in a closed-circuit system compared to contamination of a disposable, single-use suction catheter

  • PMID: 10315714
Comparative Study

Contamination of a multiple-use suction catheter in a closed-circuit system compared to contamination of a disposable, single-use suction catheter

R Ritz et al. Respir Care. 1986 Nov.

Abstract

Multiple-use (M-U) closed-system endotracheal suction catheters are effective in preventing arterial oxygen desaturation in patients on positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and may lessen the frequency of bradycardia and hypotension in unstable patients who are prone to these complications of suctioning. However, because M-U catheters remain attached to the ventilator circuit and are reintroduced repeatedly into the patient's airway over 24 hours or longer, they could become heavily contaminated with pathogens. We hypothesized a risk of autocontamination to the patient by re-inoculation of the respiratory tract with organisms that flourished on the M-U catheter while it was isolated from the patient's immune defenses or antibiotic therapy.

Methods: We tested this hypothesis in 30 mechanically ventilated adult patients with positive sputum cultures. We measured and compared the amount of bacteria present on an M-U catheter at the end of a 24-hour use period, the amount of bacteria present in the patient's sputum at that time, and the amount of bacteria present on a single-use (S-U) catheter at that time, after it had made one pass into the patient's airway. Organisms recovered and colony counts were also compared to results of a sputum culture obtained before the study began.

Results: Fourteen different pathogens or potential pathogens were recovered, in numbers of 2 x 10(1) to 2 x 10(7)colony-forming units. The greatest number of colonies was most often recovered from the sputum specimen, and statistical analysis showed no differences in rate or magnitude of contamination between M-U and S-U catheters.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources