Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1976;142(8):561-5.

Ventilation efficiency after different incisions for cholecystectomy

  • PMID: 1032061
Comparative Study

Ventilation efficiency after different incisions for cholecystectomy

P Lindell et al. Acta Chir Scand. 1976.

Abstract

Forced expiratory vital capacity (VC), forced expired volume during the 1st second (FEV1) and peak expiratory flow (PEF) were measured preoperatively and during the first four postoperative days in 44 patients undergoing cholecystectomy. 18 patients had a muscle splitting incision (M.S.), with no transection of the abdominal muscles; 15 patients had a subcostal incision with transection of the rectus muscle; 11 patients had a midline incision with transection of linea alba. Postoperatively, VC and FEV1 were reduced to 75% of the preoperative value with a m.s. incision, and to 40-55% with a subcostal or midline incision PEF was reduced to 65% of the initial value with a m.s. incision and to 50% with the other incisions. Almost every second patient with a m.s. incision had returned to the initial VC and PEF within four days, whereas only one did so with a subcostal or mid-line incision. In conclusion, the m.s. incision reduces postoperative ventilation efficiency less than other incisions. Its use may reduce postoperative pulmonary complications and shorten the hospital stay.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources