[Opportunistic screening for genital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis in sexually active population of Amsterdam. II. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening women]
- PMID: 10321301
[Opportunistic screening for genital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis in sexually active population of Amsterdam. II. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening women]
Abstract
Objective: To estimate the cost effectiveness of Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) screening of young women visiting general practitioners.
Design: Economic model analysis.
Methods: Data on the health care needs for CT complications were derived from various sources; costing was done using estimated cost prices, charges and the friction cost method; epidemiological data were derived from a pilot study among 22 general practices in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. The analyses were carried out assuming screening with ligase chain reaction test of a urine sample and treatment of identified cases of infection with single-dose azitromycin. The model intervention consisted of screening all heterosexually active women aged 15-19, 15-24, 15-29, or 15-34 years (strategies 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively). Cost effectiveness was presented in net direct and indirect costs per woman cured and per major outcome averted (pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), chronic pelvic pain, ectopic pregnancy, infertility and pneumonia of newborns).
Results: The first two strategies were cost saving. For the third strategy net costs per woman cured and per major outcome averted were almost 110.- Dutch guilders (DFL) and over DFL 300, respectively. The last strategy costs over DFL 320 per woman cured and over DFL 910 per major outcome averted. The cost effectiveness was sensitive to the assumed probability of progression of CT infection to PID.
Conclusion: Universal implementation of the screening programme investigated in Amsterdam for women aged 15-24 years would result in approximately equal savings and costs. Screening of all 15-29-year-old women would require a net investment of DFL 350,000.
Comment in
-
[Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection: which group should be targeted and at what price?].Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1999 Mar 27;143(13):652-3. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1999. PMID: 10321294 Dutch.
-
[Opportunistic screening for genital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis in sexually active population of Amsterdam. II. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening women].Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1999 May 8;143(19):1012. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1999. PMID: 10368724 Dutch. No abstract available.
-
[Screening for asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infection: cost-effectiveness favorable at a minimum prevalence rate of 3% or more].Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2001 Mar 10;145(10):499-501. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2001. PMID: 11268916 Dutch. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
[Screening for asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infection in pregnancy; cost-effectiveness favorable at a minimum prevalence rate of 3% or more].Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2000 Dec 2;144(49):2350-4. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2000. PMID: 11129971 Dutch.
-
[Opportunistic screening for genital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis among the sexually active population in Amsterdam. III. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening women and the role of reinfection and partner treatment].Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1999 Nov 20;143(47):2383-5. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1999. PMID: 10590778 Dutch.
-
The cost and cost-effectiveness of opportunistic screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in Ireland.Sex Transm Infect. 2012 Apr;88(3):222-8. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2011-050067. Epub 2012 Jan 2. Sex Transm Infect. 2012. PMID: 22213681
-
Overestimation of complication rates in evaluations of Chlamydia trachomatis screening programmes--implications for cost-effectiveness analyses.Int J Epidemiol. 2004 Apr;33(2):416-25. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyh029. Int J Epidemiol. 2004. PMID: 15082651 Review.
-
Epidemiology of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women and the cost-effectiveness of screening.Hum Reprod Update. 2010 Mar-Apr;16(2):189-204. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmp035. Epub 2009 Oct 14. Hum Reprod Update. 2010. PMID: 19828674 Review.
Cited by
-
Cost effectiveness analysis of a population based screening programme for asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infections in women by means of home obtained urine specimens.Sex Transm Infect. 2001 Aug;77(4):276-82. doi: 10.1136/sti.77.4.276. Sex Transm Infect. 2001. PMID: 11463928 Free PMC article.
-
Pharmacoeconomics of influenza vaccination in the elderly: reviewing the available evidence.Drugs Aging. 2000 Sep;17(3):217-27. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200017030-00005. Drugs Aging. 2000. PMID: 11043820 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical