Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1999 Jan-Mar;3(1):23-5.

Investigation of bile ducts before laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Investigation of bile ducts before laparoscopic cholecystectomy

V K Thumbe et al. JSLS. 1999 Jan-Mar.

Abstract

Background: Since the advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, there has been controversy about the investigation of the bile ducts and the management of common bile duct stones. Routine peroperative cholangiography (POC) in all cases has been recommended. We have adopted a policy of not performing routine POC, and the results of 700 cases are reported.

Methods: Since 1990, all patients have undergone preoperative ultrasound scan. We have performed selective preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) because of a clinical history of jaundice and/or pancreatitis, abnormal liver function tests and ultrasound evidence of dilated bile ducts (N=78, 11.1%). The remaining 622 patients did not have a routine POC, but selective peroperative cholangiogram (POC) was performed only in 42 patients (6%) because of unsuccessful ERCP or mild alteration in the criteria for the presence of bile duct stones. The remaining 580 patients did not undergo POC. Careful dissection of Calot's triangle was performed in all cases to reduce the risk of bile duct injuries.

Results: The overall operative complications, postoperative morbidity and mortality was 1.71%, 2.14% and 0.43%, respectively. Bile duct injuries occurred in two patients (0.26%) and both were recognized during the operation and repaired. There was a single incidence of retained stone in this series of 700 cases (0.14%), which required postoperative ERCP.

Conclusions: This policy of selective preoperative ERCP, and not routine peroperative cholangiogram, is cost effective and not associated with significant incidence of retained stones or bile duct injuries after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Olsen D. Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 1997;11(2):133–138 - PubMed
    1. Kullman E, Borch K, Lindstrome, Svanvik J, Anderberg B. Management of bile duct stones in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: appraisal of routine operative cholangiography and endoscopic treatment. Eur J Surg. 1996;162(11):873–880 - PubMed
    1. Lorimer JW, Lauzon J, Fairfull-Smith RJ, Yelle JD. Management of choledocholithiasis in the time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 1997;174(1):68–71 - PubMed
    1. Tham TC, Lichtenstein DR, Vandervoort J, et al. Role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for suspected choledocholithiasis in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;47(l):50–56 - PubMed
    1. Korman J, Cosgrove J, Furman M, Nathan I, Cohen J. Role of ERCP and cholangiography in laparoscopic era. Ann Surg. 1996;223(2):212–216 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources