Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1999 Jan;80(1):F43-5.
doi: 10.1136/fn.80.1.f43.

Prevalence and clinical significance of cardiac murmurs in neonates

Affiliations

Prevalence and clinical significance of cardiac murmurs in neonates

S Ainsworth et al. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1999 Jan.

Abstract

Aim: To determine the prevalence and clinical significance of murmurs detected during routine neonatal examination.

Methods: In a two year prospective study, 7204 newborn babies underwent routine examination by senior house officers. All those with murmurs underwent echocardiographic examination. All babies presenting later in infancy were also identified, to ascertain the total prevalence of congenital heart disease in infancy.

Results: Murmurs were detected in 46 babies (0.6%) of whom 25 had a cardiac malformation. The most common diagnosis was a ventricular septal defect, although four babies had asymptomatic left heart outflow obstruction. A further 32 infants from the same birth cohort had a normal neonatal examination but were found to have a cardiac malformation before 12 months of age.

Conclusions: The neonatal examination detects only 44% of cardiac malformations which present in infancy. If a murmur is heard there is a 54% chance of there being an underlying cardiac malformation. Parents and professionals should be aware that a normal neonatal examination does not preclude a clinically significant cardiac malformation. The detection of a murmur should prompt early referral to a paediatric cardiologist for diagnosis or appropriate reassurance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Circulation. 1970 Feb;41(2):343-59 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J. 1960 Mar 12;1(5175):756-9 - PubMed
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1985 Jan;121(1):31-6 - PubMed
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1988 Aug;128(2):381-8 - PubMed
    1. J Pediatr. 1992 Mar;120(3):409-15 - PubMed

Publication types