Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1999 Feb;49(439):115-7.

Should GPs have direct access to imaging for children with urinary tract infections? An observational study

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Should GPs have direct access to imaging for children with urinary tract infections? An observational study

A F Polmear et al. Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Feb.

Abstract

Background: All children with urinary tract infections (UTIs) should undergo imaging of the urinary tract. The Royal College of Radiologists currently recommends that such children should be referred to a paediatric specialist prior to imaging.

Aim: To investigate whether direct referral of such children by general practitioners (GPs) for imaging offers advantages over the traditional approach.

Method: Information on 100 children with UTIs, who were referred direct for imaging by GPs according to an agreed protocol, was compared with information on 100 children with UTIs referred initially to paediatric specialists.

Results: Protocol-guided direct referral resulted in less delay prior to imaging, no evidence of inappropriate referral (as judged by urinalysis and yield from imaging), greater consistency of follow-up arrangements, and a considerable saving in outpatient department (OPD) appointments. There was no increase in the overall number of referrals for imaging.

Conclusion: Given agreed protocols, there is no basis for current recommendations that GPs should not refer children with UTIs for imaging without a prior paediatric opinion.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Br J Gen Pract. 1997 Sep;47(422):575-6 - PubMed
    1. Br J Radiol. 1988 Apr;61(724):297-300 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 1994 Sep 10;309(6955):631-4 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 1994 Mar 12;308(6930):690-2 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 1994 May 7;308(6938):1193-6 - PubMed

Publication types