Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1999 Apr;16(2):74-7.
doi: 10.1177/104345429901600205.

Palatability and cost comparison of five liquid corticosteroid formulations

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Palatability and cost comparison of five liquid corticosteroid formulations

C J Hutto et al. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 1999 Apr.

Abstract

Difficulty administering oral corticosteroids to young children who are required to take these medications as part of their cancer treatment has been a concern among health care providers for many years. This problem is due in part to the bad taste associated with these preparations. Palatability is important to consider when prescribing a liquid corticosteroid. Seven members of a nursing research group in an academic pediatric setting evaluated palatability based on taste, aftertaste, texture, smell, and overall reaction to five different liquid corticosteroid formulations. These formulations included Pediapred (Medeva Pharmaceuticals, Rochester, NY), Prelone (Muro Pharmaceuticals, Tewksbury, MA), prednisone oral solution, prednisone intensol, and prednisone 10-mg tablet crushed in 10 mL of cherry syrup. The cost of each formulation was based on the cost to the participating institution. The results showed that the most palatable corticosteroid liquid formulation was also the most cost efficient. The results of this simple study have the potential to influence prescribing habits and provide caregivers with a palatable, cost-efficient corticosteroid liquid formulation.

PubMed Disclaimer