Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1999 Jun;35(6):543-53.
doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(199906)35:6<543::aid-ajim1>3.0.co;2-3.

Assessment of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency methods for identification of hazards to developing organisms, Part I: The reproduction and fertility testing guidelines

Affiliations
Review

Assessment of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency methods for identification of hazards to developing organisms, Part I: The reproduction and fertility testing guidelines

L Claudio et al. Am J Ind Med. 1999 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Successful reproduction depends on the coordination of many processes, particularly the normal development and subsequent maturation of the sexual organs. The Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 mandates that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency must protect infants and children from the effects of toxins, including those that affect the reproductive system. Therefore, the Agency finds itself at a critical juncture to make sure that the methods it requires for toxicity testing, the Health Effects Test Guidelines or Series 870 Guidelines, are adequate to determine possible toxicity to children.

Methods and results: We found that two testing protocols included in the core guidelines assess toxicological effects on developing animals. This article aims to provide a detailed analysis of the protocols included in the Reproduction and Fertility Effects Test Guideline. An accompanying article assesses the Developmental Toxicity Testing Guideline. We conducted this analysis on the basis of whether the test would yield the information needed to adequately determine risk to infants and children.

Conclusions: Our analysis concludes that given the limitations inherent in testing for reproduction and fertility effects during development, it is necessary to include a safety factor during risk assessment of chemicals. This action will fulfill the mandate expressed in the FQPA to protect infants and children from environmental hazards.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources