Assessment of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency methods for identification of hazards to developing organisms, Part I: The reproduction and fertility testing guidelines
- PMID: 10332507
- DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(199906)35:6<543::aid-ajim1>3.0.co;2-3
Assessment of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency methods for identification of hazards to developing organisms, Part I: The reproduction and fertility testing guidelines
Abstract
Background: Successful reproduction depends on the coordination of many processes, particularly the normal development and subsequent maturation of the sexual organs. The Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 mandates that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency must protect infants and children from the effects of toxins, including those that affect the reproductive system. Therefore, the Agency finds itself at a critical juncture to make sure that the methods it requires for toxicity testing, the Health Effects Test Guidelines or Series 870 Guidelines, are adequate to determine possible toxicity to children.
Methods and results: We found that two testing protocols included in the core guidelines assess toxicological effects on developing animals. This article aims to provide a detailed analysis of the protocols included in the Reproduction and Fertility Effects Test Guideline. An accompanying article assesses the Developmental Toxicity Testing Guideline. We conducted this analysis on the basis of whether the test would yield the information needed to adequately determine risk to infants and children.
Conclusions: Our analysis concludes that given the limitations inherent in testing for reproduction and fertility effects during development, it is necessary to include a safety factor during risk assessment of chemicals. This action will fulfill the mandate expressed in the FQPA to protect infants and children from environmental hazards.
Similar articles
-
Assessment of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency methods for identification of hazards to developing organisms, Part II: The developmental toxicity testing guideline.Am J Ind Med. 1999 Jun;35(6):554-63. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(199906)35:6<554::aid-ajim2>3.0.co;2-x. Am J Ind Med. 1999. PMID: 10332508 Review.
-
FIFRA Subdivision F testing Guidelines: are these tests adequate to detect potential hormonal activity for crop protection chemicals? Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act.J Toxicol Environ Health. 1997 Apr 11;50(5):415-31. doi: 10.1080/00984109708983999. J Toxicol Environ Health. 1997. PMID: 9140462 Review.
-
Chemical testing strategies for predicting health hazards to children.Reprod Toxicol. 2000 Mar-Apr;14(2):83-94. doi: 10.1016/s0890-6238(00)00059-9. Reprod Toxicol. 2000. PMID: 10825671 Review.
-
Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.Food Chem Toxicol. 2008 Mar;46 Suppl 1:S2-70. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2008.02.008. Epub 2008 Feb 13. Food Chem Toxicol. 2008. PMID: 18328408 Review.
-
The use of developmental neurotoxicity data in pesticide risk assessments.Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2010 Sep-Oct;32(5):563-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2010.04.053. Epub 2010 Apr 14. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2010. PMID: 20398750
Cited by
-
An occupational reproductive research agenda for the third millennium.Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Apr;111(4):584-92. doi: 10.1289/ehp.5548. Environ Health Perspect. 2003. PMID: 12676620 Free PMC article.
-
Antifertility effects of Oldenlandia affinis in male rats - a preliminary study.Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med. 2011;8(4):425-8. doi: 10.4314/ajtcam.v8i4.13. Epub 2011 Jun 1. Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med. 2011. PMID: 22654221 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources