Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer
- PMID: 10334533
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.5.1474
Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer
Abstract
Purpose: Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is a newer technique for assessing the estrogen receptor (ER) status of breast cancers, with the potential to overcome many of the shortcomings associated with the traditional ligand-binding assay (LBA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of ER status determination by IHC, compared with LBA, to predict clinical outcome-especially response to adjuvant endocrine therapy-in a large number of patients with long-term clinical follow-up.
Patients and methods: ER status was evaluated in 1,982 primary breast cancers by IHC on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections, using antibody 6F11 and standard methodology. Slides were scored on a scale representing the estimated proportion and intensity of positive-staining tumor cells (range, 0 to 8). Results were compared with ER values obtained by the LBA in the same tumors and to clinical outcome.
Results: An IHC score of greater than 2 (corresponding to as few as 1% to 10% weakly positive cells) was used to define ER positivity on the basis of a univariate cut-point analysis of all possible scores and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients receiving any adjuvant endocrine therapy. Using this definition, 71% of all tumors were determined to be ER-positive by IHC, and the level of agreement with the LBA was 86%. In multivariate analyses of patients receiving adjuvant endocrine therapy alone, ER status determined by IHC was better than that determined by the LBA at predicting improved DFS (hazard ratios/P = 0.474/.0008 and 0.707/.3214, respectively) and equivalent at predicting overall survival (0.379/.0001 and 0.381/.0003, respectively).
Conclusion: IHC is superior to the LBA for assessing ER status in primary breast cancer because it is easier, safer, and less expensive, and has an equivalent or better ability to predict response to adjuvant endocrine therapy.
Republished in
-
Estrogen Receptor Status by Immunohistochemistry Is Superior to the Ligand-Binding Assay for Predicting Response to Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Breast Cancer.J Clin Oncol. 2023 Mar 1;41(7):1331-1338. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.02500. J Clin Oncol. 2023. PMID: 36827742
Similar articles
-
Estrogen Receptor Status by Immunohistochemistry Is Superior to the Ligand-Binding Assay for Predicting Response to Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Breast Cancer.J Clin Oncol. 2023 Mar 1;41(7):1331-1338. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.02500. J Clin Oncol. 2023. PMID: 36827742
-
Estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR), by ligand-binding assay compared with ER, PgR and pS2, by immuno-histochemistry in predicting response to tamoxifen in metastatic breast cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group Study.Int J Cancer. 2000 Mar 20;89(2):111-7. Int J Cancer. 2000. PMID: 10754487 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of estrogen receptor determinations by a biochemical ligand-binding assay and immunohistochemical staining with monoclonal antibody ER1D5 in females with lymph node positive breast carcinoma entered on two prospective clinical trials.Cancer. 1996 Aug 15;78(4):764-72. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960815)78:4<764::AID-CNCR12>3.0.CO;2-T. Cancer. 1996. PMID: 8756370
-
Determination of estrogen receptors in paraffin-embedded tissue. Techniques and the value in breast cancer treatment.Acta Oncol. 1992;31(6):611-27. doi: 10.3109/02841869209083843. Acta Oncol. 1992. PMID: 1281648 Review.
-
NCCN Task Force Report: Estrogen Receptor and Progesterone Receptor Testing in Breast Cancer by Immunohistochemistry.J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2009 Sep;7 Suppl 6:S1-S21; quiz S22-3. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2009.0079. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2009. PMID: 19755043 Review.
Cited by
-
Multiplexed quantification of estrogen receptor and HER2/Neu in tissue and cell lysates by peptide immunoaffinity enrichment mass spectrometry.Proteomics. 2012 Apr;12(8):1253-60. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201100587. Proteomics. 2012. PMID: 22577026 Free PMC article.
-
A systematic comparison of three commercial estrogen receptor assays in a single clinical outcome breast cancer cohort.Mod Pathol. 2016 Aug;29(8):799-809. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2016.74. Epub 2016 Apr 29. Mod Pathol. 2016. PMID: 27125355
-
Development of new estrogen receptor-targeting therapeutic agents for tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer.Future Med Chem. 2013 Jun;5(9):1023-35. doi: 10.4155/fmc.13.63. Future Med Chem. 2013. PMID: 23734685 Free PMC article. Review.
-
GRHL2 Enhances Phosphorylated Estrogen Receptor (ER) Chromatin Binding and Regulates ER-Mediated Transcriptional Activation and Repression.Mol Cell Biol. 2022 Oct 20;42(10):e0019122. doi: 10.1128/mcb.00191-22. Epub 2022 Aug 29. Mol Cell Biol. 2022. PMID: 36036613 Free PMC article.
-
Neratinib plus trastuzumab is superior to pertuzumab plus trastuzumab in HER2-positive breast cancer xenograft models.NPJ Breast Cancer. 2021 May 27;7(1):63. doi: 10.1038/s41523-021-00274-0. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2021. PMID: 34045483 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical