Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1999 May:23 Suppl 2:S29-33.
doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1701671.

Management strategies for the hard-to-mobilize patient

Affiliations
Review

Management strategies for the hard-to-mobilize patient

P J Stiff. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1999 May.

Abstract

Delayed hematopoietic engraftment, particularly of platelets, is seen in 5-35% of patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation. Studies indicate that delayed engraftment is related to low CD34+ cell dose, and that risk factors for poor mobilization of CD34+ cells relate primarily to the type and extent of prior therapy. Data indicating an appropriate strategy to ensure that 'hard-to-mobilize' patients will achieve adequate CD34+ cell numbers are limited. It is clear, however, that marrow harvesting (performed frequently by a number of centers), is of limited value. Remobilization, best accomplished with a regimen of high-dose chemotherapy and cytokines, is of benefit in selected patients, but has substantial costs and morbidity. Instead of ad hoc treatment of patients who have a poor first mobilization, high-risk groups should be identified prospectively, and strategies should be developed to ensure adequate mobilization in all high-risk patients. The first randomized trial utilizing this approach has recently been reported. In this trial, stem cell mobilization with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone was compared to mobilization with G-CSF combined with stem cell factor (SCF) in heavily pretreated patients with Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The combination of G-CSF and SCF led to collection of a higher total CD34+ cell dose compared to G-CSF alone. Further, more patients in the combination group were able to mobilize an optimal CD34+ cell dose (ie 5 x 10(6)/kg). Additional trials are needed to determine long-term outcomes and the economic impact of achieving optimal stem cell mobilization in these patients, who would otherwise not be candidates for high-dose chemotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources