Lateral tarsorrhaphy: is it preferable to patching?
- PMID: 10336032
- DOI: 10.1097/00003226-199905000-00010
Lateral tarsorrhaphy: is it preferable to patching?
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of lateral tarsorrhaphy for the management of postkeratoplasty epithelial defects.
Method: Thirty-six patients with persistent postkeratoplasty epithelial defects that did not heal despite topical medical therapy for a period of 96 hours were treated with either a lateral tarsorrhaphy (18 patients) or with tight patching (18 patients). All patients were evaluated daily by slit-lamp examination until complete reepithelialization occurred.
Results: The epithelial healing was significantly faster (7.61+/-0.91 days vs. 12.6+/-1.61 days, p<0.5) in the lateral tarsorrhaphy group. Further, the patients with lateral tarsorrhaphies were significantly more comfortable when compared with those of the patching group (p<0.05).
Conclusion: Lateral tarsorrhaphy provides quick symptomatic relief and faster corneal epithelial defect healing. Therefore, it may be of benefit in cases of postkeratoplasty persistent epithelial defects.
Comment in
-
Treatment of persistent epithelial defect.Cornea. 1999 Nov;18(6):739-40. Cornea. 1999. PMID: 10571310 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical