Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1999 Jun;81(6):586-92.
doi: 10.1136/hrt.81.6.586.

Waiting times and prioritization for coronary artery bypass surgery in New Zealand

M E Seddon  1 , J K French, D J Amos, K Ramanathan, S C McLaughlin, H D White
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Waiting times and prioritization for coronary artery bypass surgery in New Zealand

M E Seddon et al. Heart. 1999 Jun.

Abstract

Objectives: To review the New Zealand coronary artery bypass priority score instituted in May 1996, and specifically to determine whether it prioritizes patients at high risk of cardiac events while waiting. The New Zealand score is compared with the Ontario urgency rating score, and waiting times for surgery are compared with the maximum times recommended by the Ontario consensus panel.

Design: Retrospective review of patients accepted for isolated coronary artery bypass surgery between 1 January 1993 and 31 January 1996.

Setting: Green Lane Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.

Main outcome measures: Waiting time, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and cardiac readmission.

Results: The median waiting times were five days for hospital cases (n = 721) and 146 days for out of hospital cases (n = 701). Of the latter group, 28% waited more than a year, 33% had their surgery expedited because of worsening symptoms, and 19% failed to meet the cut off point set by the New Zealand score for acceptance onto the list. Twenty two patients died, 18 on the outpatient waiting list (waiting list mortality 2.6%, risk 0.28% per month of waiting), and 132 were readmitted, 12% with myocardial infarction and 76% with unstable angina. Risk factors for a composite end point of death or myocardial infarction and/or cardiac readmission were: previous coronary artery bypass surgery (p = 0. 001), class III or IV angina (p = 0.002), and hypertension (p = 0. 005). The New Zealand score did not identify those at risk. Excluding hospital cases, 32% had surgery within the time recommended by the Ontario consensus panel.

Conclusions: Waiting times for coronary artery bypass surgery in New Zealand are considerably longer than those in Ontario, Canada. By using a numerical cut off point, implementation of the New Zealand priority scoring system has restricted access to coronary surgery on the basis of funding constraints rather than clinical appropriateness. The score does not add greatly to the clinicians' prioritization in predicting those patients who will suffer events while waiting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of patients according to (A) the New Zealand score and (B) the Ontario score.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. N Engl J Med. 1984 Jan 5;310(1):52-6 - PubMed
    1. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985 May;5(5):1055-63 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1988 Apr 2;1(8588):750-3 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1990 May 5;335(8697):1070-3 - PubMed
    1. Can J Cardiol. 1991 Jun;7(5):207-13 - PubMed

Publication types