The added benefit of local Patanol therapy when combined with systemic Claritin for the inhibition of ocular itching in the conjunctival antigen challenge model
- PMID: 10337434
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.1999.tb01175.x
The added benefit of local Patanol therapy when combined with systemic Claritin for the inhibition of ocular itching in the conjunctival antigen challenge model
Abstract
Background: Allergic conjunctivitis very often occurs simultaneously with rhinitis in seasonal allergy sufferers. While systemic anti-allergic and antihistaminic agents are effective against many signs and symptoms of allergy, they may not adequately control ocular signs and symptoms in patients with multiple target organ hypersensitivity. Patanol (olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution, Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX), a new effective anti-allergic mast cell stabilizer with antihistaminic properties, is approved for the prevention of ocular itching due to allergic conjunctivitis.
Objective: To determine whether Patanol in combination with the systemic antihistamine Claritin (loratadine, Schering, Kenilworth, NJ) reduces the ocular itching associated with allergic conjunctivitis more effectively than Claritin alone. A topical ocular antigen challenge induced the allergic conjunctivitis in 15 subjects.
Methods: This was a randomized, double-masked study in which the contralateral eye served as the control. On Visit 1, an allergen dose which elicited response scores > 2 for ocular itching was identified. Itching was graded by the subject using a 0 to 4 point scale. At Visit 2, the threshold allergen concentration was confirmed. At Visit 3, the onset of action challenge, in addition to Claritin (10 mg tablet), each subject received Patanol in one eye and placebo in the fellow eye in a randomized, double-masked fashion. Allergen was instilled one hour after dosing, and ocular itching was graded at 3, 7, 10 and 20 minutes after challenge. At Visit 4, the duration of action challenge, the same drug regimen was followed as in Visit 3. However, allergen challenge was performed eight hours after dosing, and itching graded after 3, 7, 10 and 20 minutes.
Results: Patient eyes treated with Patanol were significantly less itchy than those treated with systemic Claritin alone at critical time points 3, 7, and 10 minutes after the onset of action challenge (p < 0.05), and at 3 and 7 minutes after the duration of action challenge (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: The addition of topical Patanol to systemic Claritin therapy significantly reduced ocular itching associated with allergic conjunctivitis compared to treatment with Claritin alone. These findings prove the added benefit of local Patanol therapy in the treatment of ocular allergic symptoms in patients receiving systemic antihistamines for concomitant systemic allergies.
Similar articles
-
An evaluation of onset and duration of action of patanol (olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution 0.1%) compared to Claritin (loratadine 10 mg) tablets in acute allergic conjunctivitis in the conjunctival allergen challenge model.Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl. 2000;(230):60-3. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0420.2000.078s230060.x. Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl. 2000. PMID: 11057354 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of ketotifen fumarate ophthalmic solution alone, desloratadine alone, and their combination for inhibition of the signs and symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis in the conjunctival allergen challenge model: a double-masked, placebo- and active-controlled trial.Clin Ther. 2003 Jul;25(7):1975-87. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(03)80199-6. Clin Ther. 2003. PMID: 12946545 Clinical Trial.
-
Randomized, double-masked comparison of olopatadine ophthalmic solution, mometasone furoate monohydrate nasal spray, and fexofenadine hydrochloride tablets using the conjunctival and nasal allergen challenge models.Clin Ther. 2003 Aug;25(8):2245-67. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(03)80217-5. Clin Ther. 2003. PMID: 14512132 Clinical Trial.
-
A review of olopatadine for the treatment of ocular allergy.Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2004 Sep;5(9):1979-94. doi: 10.1517/14656566.5.9.1979. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2004. PMID: 15330735 Review.
-
Mast cell stabilization and anti-histamine effects of olopatadine ophthalmic solution: a review of pre-clinical and clinical research.Curr Med Res Opin. 2005 Sep;21(9):1377-87. doi: 10.1185/030079905X56547. Curr Med Res Opin. 2005. PMID: 16197656 Review.
Cited by
-
Ocular allergy guidelines: a practical treatment algorithm.Drugs. 2002;62(11):1611-34. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200262110-00004. Drugs. 2002. PMID: 12109924 Review.
-
Efficacy and tolerability of newer antihistamines in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis.Drugs. 2005;65(2):215-28. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200565020-00004. Drugs. 2005. PMID: 15631542 Review.
-
A review of the use of olopatadine in allergic conjunctivitis.Int Ophthalmol. 2004 May;25(3):171-9. doi: 10.1007/s10792-004-1818-x. Int Ophthalmol. 2004. PMID: 15847317 Review.
-
Discovery to Launch of Anti-allergy (Emadine; Patanol/Pataday/Pazeo) and Anti-glaucoma (Travatan; Simbrinza) Ocular Drugs, and Generation of Novel Pharmacological Tools Such as AL-8810.ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci. 2020 Nov 5;3(6):1391-1421. doi: 10.1021/acsptsci.0c00137. eCollection 2020 Dec 11. ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci. 2020. PMID: 33344909 Free PMC article.