Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1998 Dec;7(4):200-8.
doi: 10.1136/qshc.7.4.200.

Introducing a quality improvement programme to primary healthcare teams

Affiliations

Introducing a quality improvement programme to primary healthcare teams

H Hearnshaw et al. Qual Health Care. 1998 Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate a programme in which quality improvement was facilitated, based on principles of total quality management, in primary healthcare teams, and to determine its feasibility, acceptability, effectiveness, and the duration of its effect.

Method: Primary healthcare teams in Leicestershire (n = 147) were invited to take part in the facilitated programme. The programme comprised seven team meetings, led by a researcher, plus up to two facilitated meetings of quality improvement subgroups, appointed by each team to consider specific quality issues.

Outcome measures: To assess the effect and feasibility of the programme on improving the quality of care provided, the individual quality improvement projects undertaken by the teams were documented and opportunities for improvement were noted at each session by the facilitator. The programme's acceptability was assessed with questionnaires issued in the final session to each participant. To assess the long term impact on teams, interviews with team members were conducted 3 years after the programme ended.

Results: 10 of the 27 teams that initially expressed interest in the programme agreed to take part, and six started the programme. Of these, five completed their quality improvement projects and used several different quality tools, and three completed all seven sessions of the programme. The programme was assessed as appropriate and acceptable by the participants. Three years later, the changes made during the programme were still in place in three of the six teams. Four teams had decided to undertake the local quality monitoring programme, resourced and supported by the Health Authority.

Conclusions: The facilitated programme was feasible, acceptable, and effective for a few primary healthcare teams. The outcomes of the programme can be sustained. Research is needed on the characteristics of teams likely to be successful in the introduction and maintenance of quality improvement programmes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Never mind the quality: feel the improvement.
    Wilcock PM, Campion-Smith C. Wilcock PM, et al. Qual Health Care. 1998 Dec;7(4):181. doi: 10.1136/qshc.7.4.181. Qual Health Care. 1998. PMID: 10339018 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. N Engl J Med. 1989 Jan 5;320(1):53-6 - PubMed
    1. Public Health Rep. 1992 May-Jun;107(3):257-64 - PubMed
    1. Qual Health Care. 1994 Sep;3(3):164-8 - PubMed
    1. Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Jun;45(395):297-300 - PubMed
    1. Qual Health Care. 1996 Jun;5(2):104-10 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources