Fixation disparity and nonius bias
- PMID: 10341993
- DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(98)00163-1
Fixation disparity and nonius bias
Abstract
Fixation disparity, i.e. the vergence error within Panum's area, can be measured psychophysically with two nonius (vernier) lines that are presented dichoptically, i.e. one to each eye. The observer adjusts these nonius lines to subjective alignment; the resulting physical nonius offset indicates the amount of fixation disparity. The present experiments investigate the relation between fixation disparity and the nonius bias, which is the physical offset of the nonius lines that is adjusted by the observer in order to perceive them as aligned when both nonius lines are presented to both eyes (binocular nonius bias) or both to the left or both to the right eye (monocular nonius bias). It was found that (1) the fixation disparity is correlated with the binocular nonius bias in the horizontal and vertical meridian and (2) the binocular nonius bias can be predicted from the average of the right eye and left eye monocular nonius bias. To remove the influence of the nonius bias on measured fixation disparity it is possible to calculate the fixation disparity relative to the individual binocular nonius bias, rather than to the physical coincidence of the nonius lines. This procedure tends to increase the correlation between fixation disparity and the tonic resting position of vergence. We discuss the clinical relevance of the dichoptic nonius method for measuring fixation disparity and its limitations as compared to physical recordings of eye position.
Similar articles
-
Horizontal fixation disparity measures with nonius lines.Optom Vis Sci. 2005 Nov;82(11):988-99. doi: 10.1097/01.opx.0000187843.46805.a4. Optom Vis Sci. 2005. PMID: 16317376
-
Effects of nonius line and fusion lock parameters on fixation disparity.Optom Vis Sci. 2000 Jun;77(6):309-20. doi: 10.1097/00006324-200006000-00011. Optom Vis Sci. 2000. PMID: 10879788
-
Vergence dynamics and variability of fixation disparity in children and adults.Strabismus. 2006 Jun;14(2):81-4. doi: 10.1080/09273970600701101. Strabismus. 2006. PMID: 16760113
-
Topical Review: Methodological Variables in Clinical and Laboratory Measurements of Fixation Disparity.Optom Vis Sci. 2023 Aug 1;100(8):572-594. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000002041. Epub 2023 Jul 12. Optom Vis Sci. 2023. PMID: 37436811 Review.
-
[Asthenopic complaints and ocular convergence at the computer workstation: new test procedures for practice and research].Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2003 Aug;220(8):551-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-41877. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2003. PMID: 12953158 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Effects of Prism Eyeglasses on Objective and Subjective Fixation Disparity.PLoS One. 2015 Oct 2;10(10):e0138871. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138871. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26431525 Free PMC article.
-
Does vision extract absolute distance from vergence?Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Aug;82(6):3176-3195. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02006-1. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020. PMID: 32406005 Free PMC article.
-
Eye posture and screen alignment with simulated see-through head-mounted displays.J Vis. 2025 Jan 2;25(1):9. doi: 10.1167/jov.25.1.9. J Vis. 2025. PMID: 39786732 Free PMC article.
-
Individual objective versus subjective fixation disparity as a function of forced vergence.PLoS One. 2018 Jul 6;13(7):e0199958. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199958. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 29980146 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources