Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1999 May;12(2):60-7.
doi: 10.1007/BF03168844.

Optimization of a contrast-detail-based method for electronic image display quality evaluation

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Optimization of a contrast-detail-based method for electronic image display quality evaluation

N J Hangiandreou et al. J Digit Imaging. 1999 May.

Abstract

The authors previously reported a general technique based on contrast-detail methods to provide an overall quantitative evaluation of electronic image display quality. The figure-of-merit reflecting overall display quality is called maximum threshold contrast or MTC. In this work we have optimized the MTC technique through improvements in both the test images and the figure-of-merit computation. The test images were altered to match the average luminance with that observed for clinical computed radiographic images. The figure-of-merit calculation was altered to allow for contrast-detail data with slopes not equal to -1. Preliminary experiments also were conducted to demonstrate the response of the MTC measurements to increased noise in the displayed image. MTC measurements were obtained from five observers using the improved test images displayed with maximum monitor luminance settings of 30-, 50-, and 70-ft-Lamberts. Similar measurements were obtained from two observers using test images altered by the addition of a low level of image noise. The noise-free MTC and MTC difference measurements exhibited standard deviations of 0.77 and 1.55, respectively. This indicates good measurement precision, comparable or superior to that observed using the earlier MTC technique. No statistically significant image quality differences versus maximum monitor luminance were seen. The noise-added MTC measurements were greater than the noise-free values by an average of 4.08 pixel values, and this difference was statistically significant. This response is qualitatively correct, and is judged to indicate good sensitivity of the MTC measurement to increased noise levels.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Senol E, Muka E: Spatial frequency characteristics of CRT soft-copy displays, in Kim Y (ed): Medical Imaging 1995: Image Display. Proc SPIE 2431:302–315, 1995
    1. Weibrecht M, Spekowius G, Quadfleig P, et al: Image quality assessment of monochrome monitors for medical soft copy display, in Kim Y (ed): Medical Imaging 1997: Image Display. Proc SPIE 3031:232–244, 1997
    1. Launders JH, Kengyelics SM, Cowen AR. A comprehensive physical image quality evaluation of a selenium based digital x-ray imaging system for thorax radiography. Med Phys. 1998;25:986–997. doi: 10.1118/1.598276. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cohen G, DiBianca FA. The use of contrast-detail-dose evaluation of image quality in a computed tomographic scanner. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1979;3:189–195. doi: 10.1097/00004728-197904000-00008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Constable RT, Henkelman RM. Contrast, resolution and detectability in MR imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1991;15:297–303. doi: 10.1097/00004728-199103000-00021. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources