Autopsy: quality assurance in the ICU
- PMID: 10342508
- DOI: 10.1007/s001340050858
Autopsy: quality assurance in the ICU
Abstract
Objective: To examine the correlation between the clinical diagnosis and autopsy findings in adult patients who died in an intensive care unit (ICU). To determine the rate of agreement of the basic and terminal causes of death and the types of errors in order to improve quality control of future care.
Design: Retrospective study.
Setting: Adult ICU in a university hospital.
Patients: 30 adult patients who died in the ICU, with the exclusion of medicolegal cases.
Methods and main results: Anatomo-clinical meetings were held to analyze the pre- and postmortem correlations in 30 consecutive autopsies at the ICU of the University Hospital, School of Medicine of Botucatu/ UNESP, from January 1994 to January 1997. The rate of correct clinical diagnoses of the basic cause was 66.7%; in 23.3% of cases, if the correct diagnosis was made, management would have been different, as would have been the evolution of the patient's course (Class I error); in 10% of the cases the error would not have led to a change in management (Class II error). The rate of correct clinical diagnoses of terminal cause was 80%.
Conclusions: The rate of recognition of the basic cause was 66.7%, which is consistent with the literature, but the Class I error rate was higher than that reported in the literature.
Comment in
-
The autopsy as a tool to monitor diagnostic error.Intensive Care Med. 1999 Apr;25(4):343-4. doi: 10.1007/s001340050853. Intensive Care Med. 1999. PMID: 10342503 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Do autopsies of critically ill patients reveal important findings that were clinically undetected?Crit Care Med. 1998 Aug;26(8):1332-6. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199808000-00015. Crit Care Med. 1998. PMID: 9710090
-
The relationship of pre mortem diagnoses and post mortem findings in a surgical intensive care unit.Crit Care Med. 1999 Feb;27(2):299-303. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199902000-00035. Crit Care Med. 1999. PMID: 10075053
-
Autopsy as quality assurance in the intensive care unit.Crit Care Med. 1988 Jul;16(7):683-5. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198807000-00007. Crit Care Med. 1988. PMID: 3371045
-
Diagnostic Error in the Critically Ill: A Hidden Epidemic?Crit Care Clin. 2022 Jan;38(1):11-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2021.09.005. Crit Care Clin. 2022. PMID: 34794625 Review.
-
[Interdisciplinary ultrasound-guided, minimally invasive autopsy in COVID-19-deceased patients in the intensive care unit of a university hospital : A proof-of-concept study].Pathologie (Heidelb). 2023 Dec;44(Suppl 3):193-197. doi: 10.1007/s00292-023-01248-8. Epub 2023 Dec 5. Pathologie (Heidelb). 2023. PMID: 38051339 Free PMC article. Review. German.
Cited by
-
Clinical vs. autopsy diagnostic discrepancies in the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis of autopsy series.Intensive Care Med. 2024 Dec;50(12):1971-1982. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07641-y. Epub 2024 Sep 17. Intensive Care Med. 2024. PMID: 39287650
-
Premortem clinical diagnoses and postmortem autopsy findings: discrepancies in critically ill cancer patients.Crit Care. 2007;11(2):R48. doi: 10.1186/cc5782. Crit Care. 2007. PMID: 17448238 Free PMC article.
-
Clinico-pathological discrepancies in a general university hospital in São Paulo, Brazil.Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2008 Oct;63(5):581-8. doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322008000500003. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2008. PMID: 18925315 Free PMC article.
-
Post mortem scientific sampling and the search for causes of death in intensive care: what information should be given and what consent should be obtained?J Med Ethics. 2011 Mar;37(3):132-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.037739. Epub 2010 Dec 24. J Med Ethics. 2011. PMID: 21186206 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of clinical and post-mortem findings in intensive care unit patients.Virchows Arch. 2007 Mar;450(3):329-33. doi: 10.1007/s00428-006-0364-5. Epub 2007 Jan 25. Virchows Arch. 2007. PMID: 17252230
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources