Social differences of very preterm birth in Europe: interaction with obstetric history. Europop Group
- PMID: 10342799
- DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009734
Social differences of very preterm birth in Europe: interaction with obstetric history. Europop Group
Abstract
Social differences of very preterm birth (22-32 completed weeks of amenorrhea) were studied using data from a large case-control survey in Europe between 1994 and 1997; 1,675 very preterm births and 7,965 full-term births were included. The relation between social factors and very preterm birth was studied according to obstetric history and the mode of delivery onset. Very preterm birth was significantly related to low educational level among women with no previous adverse pregnancy outcome (odds ratio (OR) = 2.67, 95 percent confidence interval (CI) 1.66-4.28) and among primigravid women and those with previous first-trimester abortion (OR = 2.01, 95 percent CI 1.56-2.58). In this group, unemployment of all household members was associated with a double risk of very preterm birth. No significant association between very preterm birth and socioeconomic status was observed among women with previous second-trimester abortion or preterm birth. Socioeconomic indicators remained significantly associated with both spontaneous and induced very preterm births among women with no previous late fetal loss or preterm birth. The results are consistent with social factors affecting the risk of very preterm birth, but the relation differs according to obstetric history.
Similar articles
-
[Socio-economic factors associated with preterm delivery. Results of the European project in Spain].Gac Sanit. 2001 Jan-Feb;15(1):6-13. doi: 10.1016/s0213-9111(01)71511-7. Gac Sanit. 2001. PMID: 11333619 Spanish.
-
History of induced abortion as a risk factor for preterm birth in European countries: results of the EUROPOP survey.Hum Reprod. 2004 Mar;19(3):734-40. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh107. Epub 2004 Jan 29. Hum Reprod. 2004. PMID: 14998979
-
Are risk factors the same for small for gestational age versus other preterm births?Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Jul;185(1):208-15. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.114869. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001. PMID: 11483930
-
Previous induced abortions and the risk of very preterm delivery: results of the EPIPAGE study.BJOG. 2005 Apr;112(4):430-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00478.x. BJOG. 2005. PMID: 15777440
-
The epidemiology of preterm birth.Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1993 Sep;7(3):477-98. doi: 10.1016/s0950-3552(05)80445-6. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1993. PMID: 8252814 Review.
Cited by
-
Neighbourhood socio-economic status and spontaneous premature birth in Alberta.Can J Public Health. 2014 Sep 16;105(5):e383-8. doi: 10.17269/cjph.105.4370. Can J Public Health. 2014. PMID: 25365274 Free PMC article.
-
Freestanding midwifery units versus obstetric units: does the effect of place of birth differ with level of social disadvantage?BMC Public Health. 2012 Jun 22;12:478. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-478. BMC Public Health. 2012. PMID: 22726575 Free PMC article.
-
Maternal sociodemographic parameters: impact on trace element status and pregnancy outcomes in Nigerian women.J Health Popul Nutr. 2011 Apr;29(2):156-62. doi: 10.3329/jhpn.v29i2.7858. J Health Popul Nutr. 2011. PMID: 21608425 Free PMC article.
-
Does unemployment in family affect pregnancy outcome in conditions of high quality maternity care?BMC Public Health. 2006 Feb 24;6:46. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-46. BMC Public Health. 2006. PMID: 16504118 Free PMC article.
-
Social inequality in birth outcomes in Korea, 1995-2008.J Korean Med Sci. 2013 Jan;28(1):25-35. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2013.28.1.25. Epub 2013 Jan 8. J Korean Med Sci. 2013. PMID: 23341708 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical