Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1999 Mar;49(440):181-6.

Primary care group commissioning of services: the differing priorities of general practitioners and district nurses for palliative care services

Affiliations

Primary care group commissioning of services: the differing priorities of general practitioners and district nurses for palliative care services

S Barclay et al. Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Mar.

Abstract

Background: General practitioners (GPs) have become more responsible for budget allocation over the years. The 1997 White Paper has signalled major changes in GPs' roles in commissioning. In general, palliative care is ranked as a high priority, and such services are therefore likely to be early candidates for commissioning.

Aim: To examine the different commissioning priorities within the primary health care team (PHCT) by ascertaining the views of GPs and district nurses (DNs) concerning their priorities for the future planning of local palliative care services and the adequacy of services as currently provided.

Method: A postal questionnaire survey was sent to 167 GP principals and 96 registered DNs in the Cambridge area to ascertain ratings of service development priority and service adequacy, for which written comments were received.

Results: Replies were received from 141 (84.4%) GPs and 86 (90%) DNs. Both professional groups agreed that the most important service developments were urgent hospice admission for symptom control or terminal care, and Marie Curie nurses. GPs gave greater priority than DNs to specialist doctor home visits and Macmillan nurses. DNs gave greater priority than GPs to Marie Curie nurses, hospital-at-home, non-cancer patients' urgent hospice admission, day care, and hospice outpatients. For each of the eight services where significant differences were found in perceptions of service adequacy, DNs rated the service to be less adequate than GPs.

Conclusion: The 1997 White Paper, The New NHS, has indicated that the various forms of GP purchasing are to be replaced by primary care groups (PCGs), in which both GPs and DNs are to be involved in commissioning decisions. For many palliative care services, DNs' views of service adequacy and priorities for future development differ significantly from their GP colleagues; resolution of these differences will need to be attained within PCGs. Both professional groups give high priority to the further development of quick-response clinical services, especially urgent hospice admission and Marie Curie nurses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Adv Nurs. 1993 Mar;18(3):408-15 - PubMed
    1. Br J Gen Pract. 1993 Feb;43(367):57-9 - PubMed
    1. J Adv Nurs. 1993 May;18(5):707-13 - PubMed
    1. J Palliat Care. 1993 Summer;9(2):33-8 - PubMed
    1. Soc Sci Med. 1993 Oct;37(7):851-7 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms