Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1998 Dec;14(6):671-84.
doi: 10.2165/00019053-199814060-00007.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of formoterol versus salmeterol in patients with asthma

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Cost-effectiveness analysis of formoterol versus salmeterol in patients with asthma

M P Rutten-van Mölken et al. Pharmacoeconomics. 1998 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the relative economic consequences of treating asthmatics with twice daily dry powder formoterol 12 micrograms as compared with salmeterol 50 micrograms from a societal perspective.

Design and setting: A randomised, 6-month, open-label study including 482 patients with asthma was conducted in Italy, Spain, France, Switzerland, the UK and Sweden. Medical costs included the costs of medications, physician services, emergency room visits, hospital admissions and lung function and other tests. Travel costs and costs of production loss were also calculated. Unit prices were estimated from external sources. To pool the costs of the 6 countries, European currencies were converted to US dollars using 1995 exchange rates. Outcome measures were the number of episode-free days (EFDs) and the number of patients reaching a clinically relevant improvement in quality of life as measured using the St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire.

Main outcome measures and results: There were no significant differences between the 2 treatment arms in the frequency of emergency room visits, hospital admissions, use of rescue medication or contacts with general practitioners (GPs), specialists or nurses. Median medical costs over 6 months were $US828 per patient with formoterol and $US850 with salmeterol. This difference was not statistically significant. In both groups, about 60% of all days were episode-free. Average costs per EFD were about $US9 for both treatments. The average cost per patient reaching a clinically relevant improvement in quality of life was between $US1300 and $US1400. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were not calculated because both costs and outcomes were not significantly different. Asthma-related absenteeism ranged between 3 days and 6 months per patient in both groups.

Conclusions: There was no evidence to suggest that either treatment was more cost effective than the other.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Eur Respir J. 1991 Feb;4(2):218-26 - PubMed
    1. J Rheumatol. 1995 Jul;22(7):1408-11 - PubMed
    1. Eur Respir J. 1995 Jun;8(6):888-98 - PubMed
    1. J Health Econ. 1991 Jul;10(2):227-34 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 1993 Apr 17;306(6884):1034-7 - PubMed

MeSH terms