Cost-effectiveness analysis of formoterol versus salmeterol in patients with asthma
- PMID: 10346418
- DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199814060-00007
Cost-effectiveness analysis of formoterol versus salmeterol in patients with asthma
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the relative economic consequences of treating asthmatics with twice daily dry powder formoterol 12 micrograms as compared with salmeterol 50 micrograms from a societal perspective.
Design and setting: A randomised, 6-month, open-label study including 482 patients with asthma was conducted in Italy, Spain, France, Switzerland, the UK and Sweden. Medical costs included the costs of medications, physician services, emergency room visits, hospital admissions and lung function and other tests. Travel costs and costs of production loss were also calculated. Unit prices were estimated from external sources. To pool the costs of the 6 countries, European currencies were converted to US dollars using 1995 exchange rates. Outcome measures were the number of episode-free days (EFDs) and the number of patients reaching a clinically relevant improvement in quality of life as measured using the St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire.
Main outcome measures and results: There were no significant differences between the 2 treatment arms in the frequency of emergency room visits, hospital admissions, use of rescue medication or contacts with general practitioners (GPs), specialists or nurses. Median medical costs over 6 months were $US828 per patient with formoterol and $US850 with salmeterol. This difference was not statistically significant. In both groups, about 60% of all days were episode-free. Average costs per EFD were about $US9 for both treatments. The average cost per patient reaching a clinically relevant improvement in quality of life was between $US1300 and $US1400. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were not calculated because both costs and outcomes were not significantly different. Asthma-related absenteeism ranged between 3 days and 6 months per patient in both groups.
Conclusions: There was no evidence to suggest that either treatment was more cost effective than the other.
Similar articles
-
Cost effectiveness of budesonide/formoterol for maintenance and reliever therapy versus salmeterol/fluticasone plus salbutamol in the treatment of asthma.Pharmacoeconomics. 2006;24(7):695-708. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200624070-00008. Pharmacoeconomics. 2006. PMID: 16802845 Clinical Trial.
-
Canadian economic evaluation of budesonide-formoterol as maintenance and reliever treatment in patients with moderate to severe asthma.Can Respir J. 2007 Jul-Aug;14(5):269-75. doi: 10.1155/2007/560819. Can Respir J. 2007. PMID: 17703241 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Budesonide/formoterol as maintenance and reliever treatment compared to fixed dose combination strategies - a Canadian economic evaluation.Can J Clin Pharmacol. 2008 Summer;15(2):e165-76. Epub 2008 Jun 1. Can J Clin Pharmacol. 2008. PMID: 18515918 Clinical Trial.
-
Cost-effectiveness of eformoterol Turbohaler versus salmeterol Accuhaler in children with symptomatic asthma.Respir Med. 2002 Apr;96(4):250-8. doi: 10.1053/rmed.2001.1258. Respir Med. 2002. PMID: 12000004 Clinical Trial.
-
Economic evaluations.Can Respir J. 2007 Jul-Aug;14(5):264-6. doi: 10.1155/2007/107253. Can Respir J. 2007. PMID: 17874484 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Design, analysis and presentation of multinational economic studies: the need for guidance.Pharmacoeconomics. 2002;20(2):75-90. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200220020-00001. Pharmacoeconomics. 2002. PMID: 11888360 Review.
-
The analysis of multinational cost-effectiveness data for reimbursement decisions: a critical appraisal of recent methodological developments.Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(12):1079-96. doi: 10.2165/11537760-000000000-00000. Pharmacoeconomics. 2010. PMID: 21080734
-
Cost Effectiveness of Pharmacological Treatments for Asthma: A Systematic Review.Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Oct;36(10):1165-1200. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0668-8. Pharmacoeconomics. 2018. PMID: 29869050
-
The limited incorporation of economic analyses in clinical practice guidelines.J Gen Intern Med. 2002 Mar;17(3):210-20. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10522.x. J Gen Intern Med. 2002. PMID: 11929508 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of formoterol versus salmeterol in the treatment of patients with asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Res Med Sci. 2015 May;20(5):483-90. doi: 10.4103/1735-1995.163974. J Res Med Sci. 2015. PMID: 26487878 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical