Resource utilisation in the management of dyslipidaemia
- PMID: 10346424
- DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199814003-00002
Resource utilisation in the management of dyslipidaemia
Abstract
In Western countries, cardiovascular disease accounts for substantial morbidity and mortality. In the US, where medical costs and intervention rates are the highest in the world, the direct and indirect costs of cardiovascular disease and stroke have been estimated at $US274 billion (1998 dollars), with the costs of hospitalisation ($US119.9 billion) and lost productivity because of early mortality ($US77.9 billion) representing the largest proportions of this amount. Dyslipidaemia is an important risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD), a condition which accounts for $US39.3 billion and $US37.9 billion (1998 dollars) in hospitalisation/nursing home costs and lost productivity, respectively, annually in the US. Similarly, the UK National Health Service spends more than 500 million pounds sterling annually on the treatment of CHD. Numerous studies have shown the benefit of lowering cholesterol levels in terms of decreasing CHD-associated morbidity and mortality; however, drug therapy costs for dyslipidaemia can be high. US and European treatment guidelines for dyslipidaemia recommend aggressive treatment for those at highest CHD event risk. Because of the high prevalence of dyslipidaemia in Western countries, these recommendations impact on a substantial proportion of the population and have increased the use of cholesterol-lowering medications. In a limited number of economic studies using clinical data from large prevention trials, the cost of drug therapy was nearly offset by the reduction in costs associated with hospitalisation and revascularisation procedures. Therefore, it appears that the strategy of identifying and treating individuals at highest risk for CHD, although expensive in terms of drug costs, would be expected to reduce the substantial direct and indirect costs associated with this condition.
Similar articles
-
The cost of treating dyslipidaemia using National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) guidelines.Pharmacoeconomics. 1998;14 Suppl 3:19-28. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199814003-00003. Pharmacoeconomics. 1998. PMID: 10346425 Review.
-
Cost-effectiveness of simvastatin in people at different levels of vascular disease risk: economic analysis of a randomised trial in 20,536 individuals.Lancet. 2005 May 21-27;365(9473):1779-85. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)63014-0. Lancet. 2005. PMID: 15910950
-
Impact of dyslipidaemia. Lessons from clinical trials.Pharmacoeconomics. 1998;14 Suppl 3:1-9. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199814003-00001. Pharmacoeconomics. 1998. PMID: 10346423 Review.
-
Economic benefits of aggressive lipid lowering: a managed care perspective.Am J Manag Care. 1998 Jan;4(1):65-74. Am J Manag Care. 1998. PMID: 10179907
-
Work productivity loss and indirect costs associated with new cardiovascular events in high-risk patients with hyperlipidemia: estimates from population-based register data in Sweden.Eur J Health Econ. 2016 Dec;17(9):1117-1124. doi: 10.1007/s10198-015-0749-y. Epub 2015 Nov 25. Eur J Health Econ. 2016. PMID: 26607457 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Research trends in contemporary health economics: a scientometric analysis on collective content of specialty journals.Health Econ Rev. 2024 Jan 25;14(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s13561-023-00471-6. Health Econ Rev. 2024. PMID: 38270771 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A pharmacoeconomic evaluation of statins in the treatment of hypercholesterolaemia in the primary care setting in Spain.Pharmacoeconomics. 2005;23(3):275-87. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200523030-00007. Pharmacoeconomics. 2005. PMID: 15836008
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources