Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1999 Jun;43(6):1379-82.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.43.6.1379.

Emergence of antibiotic-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: comparison of risks associated with different antipseudomonal agents

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Emergence of antibiotic-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: comparison of risks associated with different antipseudomonal agents

Y Carmeli et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999 Jun.

Abstract

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a leading cause of nosocomial infections. The risk of emergence of antibiotic resistance may vary with different antibiotic treatments. To compare the risks of emergence of resistance associated with four antipseudomonal agents, ciprofloxacin, ceftazidime, imipenem, and piperacillin, we conducted a cohort study, assessing relative risks for emergence of resistant P. aeruginosa in patients treated with any of these drugs. A total of 271 patients (followed for 3,810 days) with infections due to P. aeruginosa were treated with the study agents. Resistance emerged in 28 patients (10.2%). Adjusted hazard ratios for the emergence of resistance were as follows: ceftazidime, 0.7 (P = 0.4); ciprofloxacin, 0.8 (P = 0.6); imipenem, 2.8 (P = 0.02); and piperacillin, 1.7 (P = 0.3). Hazard ratios for emergence of resistance to each individual agent associated with treatment with the same agent were as follows: ceftazidime, 0.8 (P = 0.7); ciprofloxacin, 9.2 (P = 0.04); imipenem, 44 (P = 0.001); and piperacillin, 5.2 (P = 0.01). We concluded that there were evident differences among antibiotics in the likelihood that their use would allow emergence of resistance in P. aeruginosa. Ceftazidime was associated with the lowest risk, and imipenem had the highest risk.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Basustaoglu A C, Gun H, Saracli M A, Baysallar M, Haznedaroglu T. Development of resistance to imipenem among nosocomial isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1995;14:469–470. - PubMed
    1. Carmeli, Y., N. Troillet, A. W. Karchmer, and M. H. Samore. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: health and economic impact of antibiotic resistance and emergence of resistance. Arch. Intern. Med., in press. - PubMed
    1. Charlson M E, Pompei P, Ales K L, McKenzie C R. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–383. - PubMed
    1. Cometta A, Baumgartner J D, Lew D, Zimmerli W, Pittet D, Chopart P, Schaad U, Herter C, Eggimann P, Huber O, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of imipenem monotherapy with imipenem plus netilmicin for treatment of severe infections in nonneutropenic patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994;38:1309–1313. - PMC - PubMed
    1. D’Agata E L, Vekataraman L, DeGirolami P, Samore M. Molecular epidemiology of ceftazidime-resistant gram-negative bacilli in a nonoutbreak setting. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35:2602–2605. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources