Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1999 Mar;3(1):55-60.
doi: 10.1023/a:1009827607495.

The middle cardiac vein--a novel pathway to reduce the defibrillation threshold

Affiliations
Comparative Study

The middle cardiac vein--a novel pathway to reduce the defibrillation threshold

P R Roberts et al. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 1999 Mar.

Abstract

Defibrillation energy requirements of epicardial implantable cardioverter defibrillator systems are generally lower than endovascular systems currently used. The former has the disadvantage of requiring a thoracotomy and so has a greater morbidity and mortality than an endovascular procedure. The middle cardiac vein (MCV) is an epicardial structure that is accessible by a non-thoracotomy approach. This study investigated the merits of ventricular defibrillation from the middle cardiac vein. METHODS AND RESULTS. Defibrillation thresholds (DFT) were measured in 10 anesthetized pigs, weighing 34.5 +/- 44.1 kg (mean 39 kg). An Angeflex electrode (1.7 mm x 50 mm) was introduced via the left external jugular vein to the right ventricular apex. The MCV was identified with standard angiography techniques and a 4080 (Angeion Corp.) defibrillation electrode (1.6 mm x 65 mm) introduced into the vein. An active can was implanted in the left subpectoral region. The defibrillation thresholds (DFT) of the following defibrillation configurations were assessed using a modified four-reversal binary search: RV-->Can, RV + MCV-->Can and MCV-->Can. The DFT's for the three configurations were 15.5 +/- 2.8 J, 10.8 +/- 3.4 J and 13.7 +/- 2.4 J. Analysis of variance showed that the DFT with the RV + MCV combination was significantly less than the RV alone (p < 0.05)

Conclusions: Defibrillation is possible through the MCV and that incorporating an electrode in the MCV with RV-Can configuration can reduce the DFT by 30%.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1995 Jan;18(1 Pt 2):229-32 - PubMed
    1. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1997 Jan;20(1 Pt 2):163-7 - PubMed
    1. Circulation. 1990 Apr;81(4):1252-9 - PubMed
    1. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986 Dec;8(6):1393-405 - PubMed
    1. Circulation. 1994 Jun;89(6):2641-4 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources