Combined infratemporal fossa and transfacial approach to excising massive tumors
- PMID: 10355196
Combined infratemporal fossa and transfacial approach to excising massive tumors
Abstract
Massive tumors of the infratemporal and pterygopalatine fossa are usually resected via the Fisch type C infratemporal fossa approach. This approach provides the surgeon with wide enough access to safely remove massive tumors, and it allows excellent control of the internal carotid artery without leaving facial scars. The disadvantages of this approach include a total loss of hearing on the affected side and the risk of damage to the facial nerve. The Fisch type D infratemporal preauricular approach provides a limited access to tumors, but it does preserve hearing. We studied the practice of combining the Fisch type D approach with a transfacial, transmaxillary approach. This allows the removal of massive tumors of the area without the necessity of resorting to the type C approach and the resultant loss of hearing and the possibility of facial paralysis. The flexibility of the type D infratemporal fossa approach allows the surgeon to combine it with transmaxillary, transmandibular, and periorbital approaches to remove tumors of all sizes from the infratemporal fossa, pterygopalatine fossa, parapharyngeal space, and orbit.
Similar articles
-
Endoscopic approach to the infratemporal fossa: anatomic study.Neurosurgery. 2010 Jan;66(1):196-202; discussion 202-3. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000359224.75185.43. Neurosurgery. 2010. PMID: 20023550
-
Surgical strategy for tumors located in or extending from the intracranial space to the infratemporal fossa-Advantages of the transcranial approach (zygomatic infratemporal fossa approach) and the indications for a combined transcranial and transcervical approach-.Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2009 Dec;49(12):580-6. doi: 10.2176/nmc.49.580. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2009. PMID: 20035132
-
Maxillary-fronto-temporal approach for removal of recurrent malignant infratemporal fossa tumors: Anatomical and clinical study.J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014 Apr;42(3):206-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2013.05.001. Epub 2013 Aug 8. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014. PMID: 23932542
-
Evolution and advances of the lateral surgical approaches to cranial base neoplasms.J Neurooncol. 1994;20(3):337-61. doi: 10.1007/BF01053048. J Neurooncol. 1994. PMID: 7844626 Review.
-
The infratemporal fossa approach to skull base surgery.Ear Nose Throat J. 1991 Sep;70(9):620-36. Ear Nose Throat J. 1991. PMID: 1743112 Review.
Cited by
-
Temporal craniotomy for surgical access to the infratemporal fossa.Skull Base. 2010 Mar;20(2):93-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1246225. Skull Base. 2010. PMID: 20808533 Free PMC article.
-
Combined craniofacial approach for the removal of a large trigeminal schwannoma invading the infratemporal fossa.Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Jun;16(2):211-6. doi: 10.1007/s10006-011-0288-3. Epub 2011 Aug 13. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012. PMID: 21842149
-
Microanatomy and surgical approaches to the infratemporal fossa: an anaglyphic three-dimensional stereoscopic printing study.Skull Base. 2007 Sep;17(5):285-302. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-985193. Skull Base. 2007. PMID: 18330427 Free PMC article.
-
Advantages and caveats of endoscopic to the infratemporal fossa as isolated and combined techniques.Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2024 May 9;9(3):e1242. doi: 10.1002/lio2.1242. eCollection 2024 Jun. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2024. PMID: 38736945 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical