Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1999 May;27(3):512-25.
doi: 10.3758/bf03211545.

Effects of divided attention on perceptual and conceptual memory tests: an analysis using a process-dissociation approach

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Effects of divided attention on perceptual and conceptual memory tests: an analysis using a process-dissociation approach

M Schmitter-Edgecombe. Mem Cognit. 1999 May.

Abstract

In two experiments, the nature of the relation between attention available at learning and subsequent automatic and controlled influences of memory was explored. Participants studied word lists in full and divided encoding conditions. Memory for the word lists was then tested with a perceptually driven task (stem completion) in Experiment 1 and with a conceptually driven task (category association) in Experiment 2. For recall cued with word stems, automatic influences of memory derived using the process-dissociation procedure remained invariant across a manipulation of attention that substantially reduced conscious recollection for the learning episode. In contrast, for recall cued with category names, dividing attention at learning significantly reduced the parameter estimates representing both controlled and automatic memory processes. These findings were similar to those obtained using indirect test instructions. The results suggest that, in contrast to perceptual priming, conceptual priming may be enhanced by semantic processing, and this effect is not an artifact of contamination from conscious retrieval processes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1998 Jan;24(1):3-26 - PubMed
    1. J Cogn Neurosci. 1992 Summer;4(3):244-56 - PubMed
    1. Mem Cognit. 1997 May;25(3):352-66 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1990 Mar;12(2):286-300 - PubMed
    1. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1995 May;21(3):531-47 - PubMed

Publication types