Relaxed versus activated stump muscles during casting for trans-tibial prostheses
- PMID: 10355639
- DOI: 10.3109/03093649909071606
Relaxed versus activated stump muscles during casting for trans-tibial prostheses
Abstract
In prosthetic practice, the question often arises as to whether the hand cast should be made from a contracted or from a non-contracted amputation stump. To elucidate this question, the authors have performed a study to quantify the volume difference between these 2 conditions, and to relate the differences to prosthetic fitting. Sixteen (16) trans-tibial amputees participated in the study. All of them were fitted with an ICEROSS silicone socket. Electromyographic studies, with electrodes attached to the anterior tibial and medial gastrocnemius muscles, were carried out to determine muscle contraction levels. Volume determinations were made with the CAPOD laser scanning system. Measurements were performed with and without the silicone liner on the stump. Without a silicone liner, the volume of the stump increased by 5.8% (SD=5.3) as the muscles contracted. This increase was statistically significant. With the liner donned the volume increased 3.5% (SD=3.3). This increase was also statistically significant. The volume of the prosthetic socket was also compared with the stump volume with a silicone liner on. For the relaxed stump, the difference was 1.8% (SD=10.1), and for the contracted stump -1.7% (SD=11.3). Neither difference was statistically significant. The importance of these volume changes and how they influence stiffness of the coupling between the stump and the socket are discussed. It is concluded, that the observed difference in volume between a contracted and a non-contracted stump are large enough to be considered by the prosthetist in his decision on how to make a hand cast.
Similar articles
-
Literature review of the possible advantages of silicon liner socket use in trans-tibial prostheses.Prosthet Orthot Int. 2005 Apr;29(1):27-37. doi: 10.1080/17461550500069612. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2005. PMID: 16180375 Review.
-
Morphological changes during early trans-tibial prosthetic fitting.Prosthet Orthot Int. 1998 Aug;22(2):115-22. doi: 10.3109/03093649809164472. Prosthet Orthot Int. 1998. PMID: 9747995
-
Transtibial prosthetic socket pistoning: static evaluation of Seal-In(®) X5 and Dermo(®) Liner using motion analysis system.Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2012 Jan;27(1):34-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2011.07.004. Epub 2011 Jul 26. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2012. PMID: 21794965
-
Preliminary experiences with the CIR casting system for transtibial prosthetic sockets.Prosthet Orthot Int. 2009 Jun;33(2):130-4. doi: 10.1080/03093640802676457. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2009. PMID: 19367516
-
Developments in the trans-tibial prosthetic socket fitting process: a review of past and present research.Prosthet Orthot Int. 2000 Aug;24(2):97-107. doi: 10.1080/03093640008726532. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2000. PMID: 11061196 Review.
Cited by
-
A Framework for Measuring the Time-Varying Shape and Full-Field Deformation of Residual Limbs Using 3-D Digital Image Correlation.IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2019 Oct;66(10):2740-2752. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2019.2895283. Epub 2019 Jan 24. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2019. PMID: 30676943 Free PMC article.
-
Residual limb volume change: systematic review of measurement and management.J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(8):949-86. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2010.09.0189. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011. PMID: 22068373 Free PMC article.
-
Accuracy, Repeatability, and Reproducibility of a Hand-Held Structured-Light 3D Scanner across Multi-Site Settings in Lower Limb Prosthetics.Sensors (Basel). 2024 Apr 7;24(7):2350. doi: 10.3390/s24072350. Sensors (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38610559 Free PMC article.
-
Pressure Between Residual Limb and Transtibial Prosthesis Socket Considering Muscle Contraction: A Finite Element Study.Ann Biomed Eng. 2025 Jul;53(7):1740-1753. doi: 10.1007/s10439-025-03742-x. Epub 2025 May 6. Ann Biomed Eng. 2025. PMID: 40327208
-
Sensing and actuation technologies for smart socket prostheses.Biomed Eng Lett. 2019 Nov 12;10(1):103-118. doi: 10.1007/s13534-019-00137-5. eCollection 2020 Feb. Biomed Eng Lett. 2019. PMID: 32175132 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous