Effects of added yeast on protein transmission and flux in cross-flow membrane microfiltration
- PMID: 10356265
- DOI: 10.1021/bp990023l
Effects of added yeast on protein transmission and flux in cross-flow membrane microfiltration
Abstract
Microfiltration membranes may be used to separate valuable proteins from suspensions containing cells or cell debris. Although a clean microfiltration membrane allows for complete protein transmission and high flux, both of these quantities decline in time due to membrane fouling. Using bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a model protein, flux and protein transmission during cross-flow microfiltration were studied with and without added yeast cells. Cross-flow microfiltration of BSA-only solutions results in a BSA fouling layer with low permeability forming on the membrane surface. Due to this layer, the long-term BSA transmission is typically only 25-40%. In contrast, during microfiltration of yeast-BSA mixtures, the yeast forms a cake layer on the membrane surface. The yeast cake acts as a dynamic or secondary membrane, allowing BSA monomers to pass through but preventing protein aggregates from fouling the membrane. The result is slower flux decline and higher long-term BSA transmission of typically 60-90%. For filtration of yeast-BSA mixtures at low yeast concentrations (<1 g/L), 50-100% higher BSA recovery is obtained than for BSA-only solutions with the same BSA concentration. At high yeast concentrations (>5 g/L), the protein transmission remains high, but the recovery may be lower due to reduced flux.
Similar articles
-
Membrane fouling by cell-protein mixtures: in situ characterisation using multi-photon microscopy.Biotechnol Bioeng. 2007 Apr 15;96(6):1083-91. doi: 10.1002/bit.21113. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2007. PMID: 16933334
-
A Combined Pore Blockage and Cake Filtration Model for Protein Fouling during Microfiltration.J Colloid Interface Sci. 2000 Dec 15;232(2):389-399. doi: 10.1006/jcis.2000.7231. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2000. PMID: 11097775
-
Microfiltration of recombinant yeast cells using a rotating disk dynamic filtration system.Biotechnol Bioeng. 1995 Nov 20;48(4):386-400. doi: 10.1002/bit.260480411. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1995. PMID: 18623499
-
Understanding flux patterns in membrane processing of protein solutions and suspensions.Trends Biotechnol. 1993 Nov;11(11):451-60. doi: 10.1016/0167-7799(93)90078-N. Trends Biotechnol. 1993. PMID: 7764399 Review.
-
Convective model of cross-flow microfiltration.Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 1992 May 30;40:1-36. doi: 10.1016/0001-8686(92)80070-e. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 1992. PMID: 1610523 Review.
Cited by
-
Influence of Ceramic Membrane Surface Characteristics on the Flux Behavior of a Complex Fermentation Broth.Membranes (Basel). 2021 May 28;11(6):402. doi: 10.3390/membranes11060402. Membranes (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34071382 Free PMC article.
-
Experimental Study of Membrane Fouling during Crossflow Microfiltration of Yeast and Bacteria Suspensions: Towards an Analysis at the Microscopic Level.Membranes (Basel). 2013 May 10;3(2):44-68. doi: 10.3390/membranes3020044. Membranes (Basel). 2013. PMID: 24958619 Free PMC article.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources