Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1999 Mar;90(3):355-60.
doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1999.tb00755.x.

Posttreatment M-protein nadir level is a significant prognostic factor associated with survival in multiple myeloma. Nagoya Myeloma Cooperative Study Group

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Posttreatment M-protein nadir level is a significant prognostic factor associated with survival in multiple myeloma. Nagoya Myeloma Cooperative Study Group

K Shimizu et al. Jpn J Cancer Res. 1999 Mar.

Abstract

In the present study 142 patients with myeloma (102 with IgG M-protein and 40 with IgA) treated with either VMCP (65 patients) or MMCP (77 patients) as remission induction therapy were retrospectively analyzed. Response to treatment was evaluated in terms of a more-than-50% fall of pretreatment M-protein and the posttreatment M-protein nadir. Though significantly more patients treated with MMCP achieved partial response (PR) as compared with those treated with VMCP (P=0.019) and though patients achieving PR showed a significantly longer survival than those with less responsiveness (P=0.0091), the difference in survival curves between the two treatment groups was not significant (P=0.1871). The difference in response between the treatment groups evaluated in terms of posttreatment nadir was not significant (P=0.507). Multivariate analysis identified posttreatment M-protein nadir as a significant prognostic factor associated with survival, along with 3 other factors: sex, performance status, and hemoglobin. The lack of difference between the survival curves for patients treated with the 2 regimens despite the significantly different response rates evaluated in terms of percent fall of pretreatment M-protein levels was considered to be due to the lack of a difference in the ability to induce a deep posttreatment nadir between the regimens. Posttreatment M-protein nadir is an important prognostic factor associated with survival and should be included in the evaluation of the efficacy of chemotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bergsagel , D. E.Is aggressive chemotherapy more effective in the treatment of plasma cell myeloma ?. Eur. J. Cancer Clin. Oncol. , 25 , 159 – 161 ( 1989. ). - PubMed
    1. Hjorth , M. , Hellquist , L. , Holmberg , E. , Magnusson , B. , Rodjer , S. and Westin , J.Initial treatment in multiple myeloma: no advantage of multidrug chemotherapy over melphalan‐prednisone . Br. J. Haematol. , 74 , 185 – 191 ( 1990. ). - PubMed
    1. Boccadoro , M. , Marmont , F. and Tribalto , M.Multiple myeloma: VMCP/VBAP alternating combination chemotherapy is not superior to melphalan and prednisone even in high‐risk patients . J. Clin. Oncol. , 9 , 444 – 448 ( 1991. ). - PubMed
    1. Chronic Leukemia‐Myeloma Task Force. Proposed guidelines for protocol studies. II: Plasma cell myeloma . Cancer Treat. Rep. , 4 , 145 – 158 ( 1973. ).
    1. Gore , M. E. , Selby , P. J. and Viner , C.Intensive treatment of multiple myeloma and criteria for complete remission . Lancet , ii , 879 , 882 ( 1989. ). - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Supplementary concepts