Effects of amifostine on cisplatin induced DNA adduct formation and toxicity in malignant glioma and normal tissues in rat
- PMID: 10360475
- DOI: 10.1023/a:1006152103476
Effects of amifostine on cisplatin induced DNA adduct formation and toxicity in malignant glioma and normal tissues in rat
Abstract
The chemoprotective effect of amifostine (WR2721) was studied in a BDIX rat model with intracerebral BT4C glioma implants. Twenty-one rats were given cisplatin 5 mg/kg i.p., 21 were given amifostine 200 mg/kg i.p. + cisplatin 5 mg/kg i.p. Ten rats served as untreated controls. An immunohistochemical method for analysis of cisplatin-DNA adducts was used to elucidate the adduct formation in tumor, normal brain and kidney. Tumor volume and serum creatinine level were analysed 10 days after treatment. In animals pretreated with amifostine there was a delayed adduct formation rate in the normal brain, and in the kidney cortex the number of tubular cells with extremely high adduct level was reduced. No difference in adduct formation was seen in tumors. Tumor volume was significantly larger following amifostine + cisplatin (66% of controls) compared to cisplatin alone (38% of controls). Weight loss was, however, severe in rats given cisplatin alone. In the tumor growth study only 3 out of 11 rats treated with cisplatin 5 mg/kg alone survived until time of sacrifice at 10 days, whereas all those pretreated with amifostine survived. Mean serum creatinine was 48 micromol/l (controls), 146 micromol/l (cisplatin) and 59 micromol/l (amifostine + cisplatin). A marked reduction of histopathological renal changes was found when amifostine was added. Amifostine thus significantly reduced general and renal toxicity of cisplatin. The tumor growth retardation was stronger when cisplatin was given alone but this is probably related to general toxicity and malnutrition indirectly supported by the fact that amifostine did not significantly reduce cisplatin-DNA adduct formation in tumors. The results of the present study suggest that amifostine may have a role in increasing the therapeutic ratio of cisplatin, also in the treatment of malignant glioma.
Similar articles
-
Effects of cisplatin and amphotericin B on DNA adduct formation and toxicity in malignant glioma and normal tissues in rat.Eur J Cancer. 1997 Jan;33(1):153-9. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(96)00339-5. Eur J Cancer. 1997. PMID: 9071915
-
Amifostine as a protector against cisplatin-induced toxicity in nude mice.Acta Oncol. 1999;38(2):247-53. doi: 10.1080/028418699431681. Acta Oncol. 1999. PMID: 10227448
-
The effect of dexamethasone on the uptake of cisplatin in 9L glioma and the area of brain around tumor.J Neurooncol. 1998 Mar;37(1):1-8. doi: 10.1023/a:1005835212246. J Neurooncol. 1998. PMID: 9525832
-
Amifostine reduces the incidence of cumulative nephrotoxicity from cisplatin: laboratory and clinical aspects.Semin Oncol. 1999 Apr;26(2 Suppl 7):72-81. Semin Oncol. 1999. PMID: 10348264 Review.
-
Amifostine (Ethyol): pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects in vivo.Eur J Cancer. 1996;32A Suppl 4:S26-30. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(96)00332-2. Eur J Cancer. 1996. PMID: 8976819 Review.
Cited by
-
Nasal administration of mesenchymal stem cells restores cisplatin-induced cognitive impairment and brain damage in mice.Oncotarget. 2018 Oct 30;9(85):35581-35597. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.26272. eCollection 2018 Oct 30. Oncotarget. 2018. PMID: 30473752 Free PMC article.
-
Amifostine (WR2721) confers DNA protection to in vivo cisplatin-treated murine peripheral blood leukocytes.Dose Response. 2009 Jun 11;7(3):234-46. doi: 10.2203/dose-response.08-026.Prieto. Dose Response. 2009. PMID: 19809542 Free PMC article.
-
Peripheral neuropathy and cancer.Curr Oncol Rep. 2004 Jan;6(1):20-5. doi: 10.1007/s11912-996-0005-9. Curr Oncol Rep. 2004. PMID: 14664756 Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Other Literature Sources
Medical