Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1999 Jun 15;19(12):5044-53.
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-12-05044.1999.

OCD-Like behaviors caused by a neuropotentiating transgene targeted to cortical and limbic D1+ neurons

Affiliations

OCD-Like behaviors caused by a neuropotentiating transgene targeted to cortical and limbic D1+ neurons

K M Campbell et al. J Neurosci. .

Abstract

To study the behavioral role of neurons containing the D1 dopamine receptor (D1+), we have used a genetic neurostimulatory approach. We generated transgenic mice that express an intracellular form of cholera toxin (CT), a neuropotentiating enzyme that chronically activates stimulatory G-protein (Gs) signal transduction and cAMP synthesis, under the control of the D1 promoter. Because the D1 promoter, like other CNS-expressed promoters, confers transgene expression that is regionally restricted to different D1+ CNS subsets in different transgenic lines, we observed distinct but related psychomotor disorders in different D1CT-expressing founders. In a D1CT line in which transgene expression was restricted to the following D1+ CNS regions-the piriform cortex layer II, layers II-III of somatosensory cortical areas, and the intercalated nucleus of the amygdala-D1CT mice showed normal CNS and D1+ neural architecture but increased cAMP content in whole extracts of the piriform and somatosensory cortex. These mice also exhibited a constellation of compulsive behavioral abnormalities that strongly resembled human cortical-limbic-induced compulsive disorders such as obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). These compulsive behaviors included episodes of perseverance or repetition of any and all normal behaviors, repetitive nonaggressive biting of siblings during grooming, and repetitive leaping. These results suggest that chronic potentiation of cortical and limbic D1+ neurons thought to induce glutamatergic output to the striatum causes behaviors reminiscent of those in human cortical-limbic-induced compulsive disorders.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
The human D1 dopamine receptor promoter–cholera toxin (D1CT) fusion transgene. E, EcoRI;N, NotI; (N),NotI site deleted during cloning; ORF, open reading frame (coding sequence); S,SalI; SD/SA, splice donor/splice acceptor sites; UT, untranslated region.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Detection of cholera toxin mRNA in brain extracts of affected D1CT mice. a, RT-PCR of affected D1CT-11 mouse brain poly(A+) RNA. Lane 1, Kilobase ladder DNA size marker; lane 2, RT included (+RT); lane 3, RT omitted (−RT); lane 4, RNA omitted (−RNA). b, RT-PCR of nontransgenic (control) littermate and affected D1CT-7 mouse brain poly(A+) RNA. Lane 1, Kilobase ladder DNA size marker; lane 2, control, +RT; lane 3, control, −RT; lane 4, D1CT-7, +RT;lane 5, D1CT-7, −RT; lane 6, D1CT-7 genomic DNA template (positive control); lane 7, −RNA. CT mRNA is detected in the affected D1CT-11 and D1CT-7 mouse brain extracts as a 600 bp RT-PCR fragment (a, lane 2; b, lane 4) identical in size to a positive control CT genomic DNA PCR fragment (b, lane 6).
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
D1CT transgene expression and D1 receptor and CNS neuroarchitecture of D1CT-7 mice. a, b, Bright-field view of ICC staining for the D1 receptor (dark staining with blue Nissl counterstain) in coronal brain sections, indicating no discernible changes in D1 receptor distribution, neuroanatomy, or density between control nontransgenic (a) and D1CT-7 (b) mice. c, d, Bright-field view of Nissl-stained sagittal brain sections, indicating no discernible changes in CNS morphology or neuron number between control nontransgenic (c) and D1CT-7 (d) mice. e, Bright-field view of ICC staining for the D1 receptor (dark staining) in a coronal section of the somatosensory and insular cortex [right (ventral to dorsal), insular, S2, S1] and the caudate-putamen (left), showing extensive D1 receptor expression in the caudate-putamen and less extensive but evident D1 receptor expression in the somatosensory and insular cortex, predominantly in layers II–III. f, Dark-field view of ISH staining for the presence of CT mRNA (light grains) performed on the same section shown in e, showing colocalization of CT mRNA with D1 receptor staining in the somatosensory and insular cortex layers II–III but not in the caudate-putamen. g, Dark-field view of ISH staining, detecting the presence of CT mRNA (light grains) in the piriform cortex layer II and the intercalated nucleus of the amygdala, regions that are also positive for D1 receptor mRNA and protein (data not shown). h, Higher magnification dark-field view of ISH staining of CT mRNA (light grains) in the intercalated nucleus of the amygdala in a coronal section parallel to that in g. Control nontransgenic littermates exhibit indistinguishable D1 receptor and Nissl staining in these regions and other CNS regions but no CT mRNA ISH staining (data not shown). This regionally restricted pattern of CT ISH staining to the areas shown was consistent between different D1CT-7 mice, reflecting the identical behavior of the animals of this line. For ISH, n = 3 per group; for Nissl, n = 4 per group; and for D1 receptor ICC,n = 2 per group. amy, Amygdala;c, cortex; CPu, caudate-putamen;en, endopiriform nucleus;ep/ic, entopeduncular nucleus/internal capsule; hpc, hippocampus; hyp, hypothalamus; icn, intercalated nucleus of the amygdala;pir, piriform cortex; I–VI, somatosensory cortical layers.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Elevated cAMP levels in CT+ CNS regions of D1CT-7 mice. The mean cAMP content (femtomoles of cAMP per milligram of protein) of extracts prepared from whole dissected somatosensory and piriform cortex is shown. Filled bar, D1CT-7 mice;open bar, control nontransgenic littermate mice; error bars indicate +SEM; n = 6 mice per group; *p < 0.05 using Student’s ttest.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
D1CT-7 mice nonaggressively bite their sibling cage mates. a, Sibling missing tail.b, Sibling missing ears. c, The fraction of recorded audible distress vocalizations occurring while a D1CT-7 or control nontransgenic littermate mouse was observed to have its snout in contact with another mouse. Filled bar, D1CT-7 mice;open bar, control nontransgenic littermate mice; number of observation periods per mouse = 112; n = 3 mice per group; error bars indicate +SEM; ***p < 0.001 by Student’s t test. d, Resident–intruder aggression assay. Shown are the mean number of attacks by resident D1CT-7 transgenic mice or control nontransgenic littermates on an intruder mouse within 3 min. Filled bar, D1CT-7 mice; open bar, control nontransgenic littermate mice; n = 9 mice per group; error bars indicate +SEM; *p < 0.05 using repeated measures ANOVA [F(1,7) = 6.798;p = 0.035]. The outcome of the parametric analysis was confirmed by a Wilcoxon signed rank test (Z = −2.375; p = 0.018). e, Representative transgenic lineage of D1CT-7 mouse-biting behavior.Dark symbols, D1CT mice; open symbols, control nontransgenic littermate mice; gray symbol, mouse that died before determination of transgenic status;square, male; circle, female; /, bitten mouse; B, biting mouse (determined either by direct observation or by observation that it was the only unbitten mouse in the cage); (B), biting mouse (shown to bite mate when placed in a breeding cage). f, Sequential frames extracted from a video-recording of a D1CT-7 mouse (white) repeatedly biting a sibling mouse (agouti) during conspecific grooming rather than aggressive attack. Left, Initial grooming at face, 0 sec. Middle, Grooming behind head after several bites, 12 sec. Right, Bite and startle/vocalization of sibling, 12.5 sec. Biting while grooming continues in spite of vocalizations by the bitten mouse.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
Increased locomotion, gnawing, and leaping in D1CT-7 mice. A bar graph of the mean number of observed behaviors that were >3 consecutive seconds in duration (Fray et al., 1980) is shown.Filled bars, D1CT-7 mice; open bars, control nontransgenic littermate mice; n = 14 mice per group; error bars indicate +SEM; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001 using Student’s t test. MANOVA of the predicted dopaminergically induced behaviors consisting of the dependent variables locomotion, rear, sniff, gnaw, groom, and leap indicated a significant difference between transgenic and control nontransgenic littermates [F(6,21) = 5.214;p = 0.002]. Therefore the aforementioned independent analysis of each variable was justified.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 7.
Perseverative (long-duration) and repetitive behaviors in D1CT-7 mice. a–c, Representative behavioral waveform displays (Campbell et al., 1998) of normal behavior in individual control nontransgenic littermate mouse (a) and of perseverative behavior (b; in this instance, eating) or repetitive behavior (c; in this instance, locomote-rear) in D1CT-7 mice. The type of perseverative or repetitive behavior exhibited by the D1CT-7 mice continuously varies in each individual. In this display, behavioral activities analyzed are on the y-axis, whereas time is on the x-axis. Thus, vertical lines represent transitions from one behavior to another, whereas horizontal lines represent the duration of each behavior. Periods of rapid behavioral switching appear ascondensed vertical lines or bars.d, e, Comparison of the mean duration of all behaviors (d) or of nonlocomotor behaviors (e) exhibited by D1CT-7 and control mice.Filled bars, D1CT-7 mice; open bars, control nontransgenic littermate mice; n = 6 mice per group; error bars indicate +SEM; **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001 using Student’s ttest. d shows the mean duration of all behaviors, either simple stationary (1-state) or complex locomotor-dependent (2-state), observed within a 30 min period, whereas e shows the mean duration of all simple stationary (nonlocomotor-dependent) behaviors (i.e., eat, drink, self-groom, groom other, rear, dig, and bar hang) observed within a 30 min period.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abel T, Nguyen PV, Borad M, Deuel TA, Kandel ER, Bourtchouladze R. Genetic demonstration of a role for PKA in the late phase of LTP and in hippocampus-based long-term memory. Cell. 1997;88:615–626. - PubMed
    1. Alleva E. Assessment of aggressive behavior in rodents. Methods Neurosci. 1993;14:111–137.
    1. Ariano MA, Sibley DR. Dopamine receptor distribution in the rat CNS: elucidation using anti-peptide antisera directed against D1A and D3 subtypes. Brain Res. 1994;649:95–110. - PubMed
    1. Bach ME, Hawkins RD, Osman M, Kandel ER, Mayford M. Impairment of spatial but not contextual memory in CaMKII mutant mice with a selective loss of hippocampal LTP in the range of the theta frequency. Cell. 1995;81:905–915. - PubMed
    1. Bachus SE, Kleinman JE. The neuropathology of schizophrenia. J Clin Psychiatry. 1996;57:72–83. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms