Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 1999 Jun 26;318(7200):1730-7.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7200.1730.

beta Blockade after myocardial infarction: systematic review and meta regression analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

beta Blockade after myocardial infarction: systematic review and meta regression analysis

N Freemantle et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the effectiveness of beta blockers in short term treatment for acute myocardial infarction and in longer term secondary prevention; to examine predictive factors that may influence outcome and therefore choice of drug; and to examine the clinical importance of the results in the light of current treatment.

Design: Systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

Setting: Randomised controlled trials.

Subjects: Patients with acute or past myocardial infarction.

Intervention: beta Blockers compared with control.

Main outcome measures: All cause mortality and non-fatal reinfarction.

Results: Overall, 5477 of 54 234 patients (10.1%) randomised to beta blockers or control died. We identified a 23% reduction in the odds of death in long term trials (95% confidence interval 15% to 31%), but only a 4% reduction in the odds of death in short term trials (-8% to 15%). Meta regression in long term trials did not identify a significant reduction in effectiveness in drugs with cardioselectivity but did identify a near significant trend towards decreased benefit in drugs with intrinsic sympathomimetic activity. Most evidence is available for propranolol, timolol, and metoprolol. In long term trials, the number needed to treat for 2 years to avoid a death is 42, which compares favourably with other treatments for patients with acute or past myocardial infarction.

Conclusions: beta Blockers are effective in long term secondary prevention after myocardial infarction, but they are underused in such cases and lead to avoidable mortality and morbidity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Odds of death and pooled odds ratios in short term trials (arrows indicate 95% confidence intervals exceeding range of plot). ISIS-1=first international study of infarct survival; TIMI IIB=thrombolysis in myocardial infarction phase II trial; MIAMI=metoprolol in acute myocardial infarction; CPRG=Coronary Prevention Research Group; ICSG=International Collaborative Study Group; UKCSG=UK Collaborative Study Group
Figure 2
Figure 2
Odds of death and pooled odds ratios in long term trials. LIT=lopressor intervention; BHAT=β-blocker heart attack trial
Figure 3
Figure 3
Incidence (yearly) of withdrawal from trials

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Smith J, Channer KS. Increasing prescription of drugs for secondary prevention after myocardial infarction. BMJ. 1995;311:917–918. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eccles M, Bradshaw C. Use of secondary prophylaxis against myocardial infarction in the north of England. BMJ. 1991;302:91–92. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Viskin S, Barron HV. β-Blockers prevent cardiac death following myocardial infarction: so why are so many infarct survivors discharge without β-blockers? Am J Cardiol. 1996;78:821–822. - PubMed
    1. Yusuf S, Peto R, Lewis J, Collins R, Sleight P. β-Blockade during and after myocardial infarction: an overview of the randomized trials. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1985;27:335–371. - PubMed
    1. Smith TC, Spiegelhalter DJ, Thomas A. Bayesian approaches to random-effects meta analysis: a comparative study. Stats Med. 1995;14:2685–2699. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances