Updated estimates of the effectiveness of the Yuzpe regimen of emergency contraception
- PMID: 10382076
- DOI: 10.1016/s0010-7824(99)00018-9
Updated estimates of the effectiveness of the Yuzpe regimen of emergency contraception
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to provide revised estimates of the effectiveness of the Yuzpe method of emergency contraception. Through a literature search, we identified eight studies that present the number of women treated and outcome of treatment by cycle day of unprotected intercourse relative to expected day of ovulation. Using five sets of external estimates of conception probabilities by cycle day of intercourse among women not using contraception, we assessed the effectiveness of the Yuzpe regimen. The 45 estimates of effectiveness, based on eight separate studies and the eight studies combined and five different sets of conception probabilities by cycle day, ranged from a low of 56.4% to a high of 89.3%. Our preferred point estimate is that the Yuzpe regimen reduces the risk of pregnancy by 74.1%, with a 95% confidence interval extending from 62.9% to 79.2%. True effectiveness is likely to be > 74% because treatment failures (observed pregnancies) include women who were already pregnant when treated and women who became pregnant after being treated.
Similar articles
-
New estimates of the effectiveness of the Yuzpe regimen of emergency contraception.Contraception. 1998 Jun;57(6):363-9. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(98)00042-0. Contraception. 1998. PMID: 9693395
-
Effectiveness of the Yuzpe regimen of emergency contraception by cycle day of intercourse: implications for mechanism of action.Contraception. 2003 Mar;67(3):167-71. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(02)00486-9. Contraception. 2003. PMID: 12618250
-
A reassessment of efficacy of the Yuzpe regimen of emergency contraception.Hum Reprod. 1997 Mar;12(3):496-8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/12.3.496. Hum Reprod. 1997. PMID: 9130749 Review.
-
Statistical evidence about the mechanism of action of the Yuzpe regimen of emergency contraception.Obstet Gynecol. 1999 May;93(5 Pt 2):872-6. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00380-9. Obstet Gynecol. 1999. PMID: 10912436 Review.
-
Comparison of Yuzpe regimen, danazol, and mifepristone (RU486) in oral postcoital contraception.BMJ. 1992 Oct 17;305(6859):927-31. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6859.927. BMJ. 1992. PMID: 1458074 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Turkish pharmacists' counseling practices and attitudes regarding emergency contraceptive pills.Int J Clin Pharm. 2012 Aug;34(4):579-86. doi: 10.1007/s11096-012-9647-x. Epub 2012 Apr 24. Int J Clin Pharm. 2012. PMID: 22527484
-
Advance provision of emergency contraception for pregnancy prevention (full review).Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr 18;2007(2):CD005497. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005497.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007. PMID: 17443596 Free PMC article.
-
Pharmacy students' knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding emergency contraception.Am J Pharm Educ. 2009 Apr 7;73(2):26. doi: 10.5688/aj730226. Am J Pharm Educ. 2009. PMID: 19513164 Free PMC article.
-
Community pharmacist perception and attitude toward ethical issues at community pharmacy setting in central Saudi Arabia.Saudi Pharm J. 2014 Sep;22(4):315-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2013.08.003. Epub 2013 Sep 11. Saudi Pharm J. 2014. PMID: 25161375 Free PMC article.
-
Factors associated with nurses' knowledge and prescriptive attitudes toward emergency contraception in Northern Nigeria.Ann Afr Med. 2016 Apr-Jun;15(2):91-2. doi: 10.4103/1596-3519.176202. Ann Afr Med. 2016. PMID: 27044734 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources