The new NIH and FDA medical research policies: targeting gender, promoting justice
- PMID: 10386326
- DOI: 10.1215/03616878-24-3-531
The new NIH and FDA medical research policies: targeting gender, promoting justice
Abstract
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have both recently revised their policies regarding the inclusion of women in clinical trials. Pressured by women's health activists and members of Congress, the NIH has vastly improved its policies; it now requires that women and minorities the included in clinical trials and that an analysis of gender and racial differences be performed. The FDA policy states that women and men should be included in clinical trials if both would receive the drug when marketed and that it expects a gender analysis to be performed. The FDA also lifted its 1977 ban on including women of childbearing potential in the early phases of drug studies. Analyzing these NIH and FDA policies according to a gender justice framework, I find that the NIH has moved significantly toward the institution of gender justice as it applies to medical research policies and that the FDA has taken only small steps toward this goal and lags behind the NIH.
Similar articles
-
Gender equity in research.J Womens Health. 1994 Jun;3(3):143-53. doi: 10.1089/jwh.1994.3.143. J Womens Health. 1994. PMID: 11659807 No abstract available.
-
For her own good: protecting (and neglecting) women in research.Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1996 Summer;5(3):346-61. doi: 10.1017/s0963180100007167. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1996. PMID: 8862822 No abstract available.
-
Justice and the inclusion of women in clinical studies: an argument for further reform.Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1994 Jun;4(2):117-46. doi: 10.1353/ken.0.0110. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1994. PMID: 10134749
-
Women in clinical drug trials. An update.Clin Pharmacokinet. 1994 Dec;27(6):411-7. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199427060-00002. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1994. PMID: 7882633 Review. No abstract available.
-
Inclusion of women in clinical trials: a historical overview of scientific, ethical, and legal issues.J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1998 Jan-Feb;27(1):78-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.1998.tb02594.x. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1998. PMID: 9475131 Review.
Cited by
-
Developing pathways for community-led research with big data: a content analysis of stakeholder interviews.Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Jul 8;18(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00589-7. Health Res Policy Syst. 2020. PMID: 32641140 Free PMC article.
-
Patient distrust in pharmaceutical companies: an explanation for women under-representation in respiratory clinical trials?BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Aug 13;21(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00509-y. BMC Med Ethics. 2020. PMID: 32791969 Free PMC article.
-
Needs, Priorities, and Recommendations for Engaging Underrepresented Populations in Clinical Research: A Community Perspective.J Community Health. 2017 Jun;42(3):472-480. doi: 10.1007/s10900-016-0279-2. J Community Health. 2017. PMID: 27812847 Free PMC article.
-
Enrollment and Retention of Men and Women in Health Services Research and Development Trials.Womens Health Issues. 2019 Jun 25;29 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S121-S130. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2019.03.004. Womens Health Issues. 2019. PMID: 31253236 Free PMC article.
-
Contextualising sex and gender research to improve women's health: An early- and mid-career researcher perspective.Front Glob Womens Health. 2022 Jul 19;3:942876. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2022.942876. eCollection 2022. Front Glob Womens Health. 2022. PMID: 35928054 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical