Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1999 Jul;65(7):2820-6.
doi: 10.1128/AEM.65.7.2820-2826.1999.

Method for detection and enumeration of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in feces, manures, and soils

Affiliations

Method for detection and enumeration of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in feces, manures, and soils

E Kuczynska et al. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999 Jul.

Abstract

Eight concentration and purification methods were evaluated to determine percentages of recovery of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts from calf feces. The NaCl flotation method generally resulted in the highest percentages of recovery. Based on the percentages of recovery, the amounts of fecal debris in the final oocyst preparations, the relatively short processing time (<3 h), and the low expense, the NaCl flotation method was chosen for further evaluation. Extraction efficiency was evaluated by using oocyst concentrations of 25, 50, 10(2), 10(3), 10(4), and 10(5) oocysts g of bovine feces-1. The percentages of recovery ranged from 10.8% (25 oocysts g-1) to 17.0% (10(4) oocysts g-1) (r2 = 0.996). A conservative estimate of the detection limit for bovine feces is ca. 30 oocysts g of feces-1. Percentages of recovery were determined for six different types of animal feces (cow, horse, pig, sheep, deer, and chicken feces) at a single oocyst concentration (10(4) oocysts g-1). The percentages of recovery were highest for bovine feces (17. 0%) and lowest for chicken feces (3.2%). Percentages of recovery were determined for bovine manure after 3 to 7 days of storage. The percentages of recovery ranged from 1.9 to 3.5% depending on the oocyst concentration, the time of storage, and the dispersing solution. The percentages of oocyst recovery from soils were evaluated by using different flotation solutions (NaCl, cold sucrose, ZnSO4), different dispersing solutions (Triton X-100, Tween 80, Tris plus Tween 80), different dispersion techniques (magnetic stirring, sonication, blending), and different dispersion times (5, 15, and 30 min). Twenty-five-gram soil samples were used to reduce the spatial variability. The highest percentages of recovery were obtained when we used 50 mM Tris-0.5% Tween 80 as the dispersing solution, dispersion for 15 min by stirring, and saturated NaCl as the flotation solution. The percentages of oocyst recovery from freshly spiked sandy loam, silty clay loam, and clay loam soils were ca. 12 to 18, 8, and 6%, respectively. The theoretical detection limits were ca. 1 to 2 oocysts g of soil-1 depending on the soil type. The percentages of recovery without dispersant (distilled H2O or phosphate-buffered saline) were less than 0.1%, which indicated that oocysts adhere to soil particles. The percentages of recovery decreased with storage time, although the addition of dispersant (Tris-Tween 80) before storage appeared to partially prevent adhesion. These data indicate that the NaCl flotation method is suitable for routine detection and enumeration of oocysts from feces, manures, soils, or soil-manure mixtures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1
FIG. 1
Flow diagram showing the NaCl flotation method for extracting oocysts from soils. S.G., specific gravity; IFA, immunofluorescence antibody.
FIG. 2
FIG. 2
Mean percentages of oocyst (purified) recovery from freshly spiked sandy loam, silty clay loam, and clay loam soils. The error bars indicate standard deviations (n = 6). The initial oocyst concentration was 104 oocysts per 25 g of soil.
FIG. 3
FIG. 3
Plot of percentages of oocyst (from diluted calf diarrhea) recovery from sandy loam soil versus storage time with and without dispersing solution (disp. sol.) (Tris-Tween 80). The error bars indicate standard deviations (n = 6). The initial oocyst concentration was 104 oocysts per 25 g of soil. The first sample was obtained 1 h after spiking.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Anguish L J, Ghiorse W C. Computer-assisted laser scanning and video microscopy for analysis of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in soil, sediment, and feces. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997;63:724–733. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arrowood M J, Sterling C R. Isolation of Cryptosporidium oocysts and sporozoites using discontinuous sucrose and isopycnic percoll gradients. J Parasitol. 1987;73:314–319. - PubMed
    1. Atwill E R, Sweitzer R A, Perira M, Gardiner I, van Vuren D, Boyce W. Prevalence of and associated risk factors for shedding Cryptosporidium oocysts and Giardia cysts within feral pig populations in California. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997;63:3946–3949. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bloem J, Bolhuis P R, Veninga M R, Wieringa J. Microscopic methods for counting bacteria and fungi in soil. In: Kassem A, Nannipieri P, editors. Methods in applied soil microbiology and biochemistry. New York, N.Y: Academic Press; 1995. pp. 162–173.
    1. Bukhari Z, Smith H U. Effect of three concentration techniques on viability of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts recovered from bovine feces. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33:2592–2595. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms