Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1999 Jul 3;319(7201):32-6.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7201.32.

Computer support for recording and interpreting family histories of breast and ovarian cancer in primary care (RAGs): qualitative evaluation with simulated patients

J Emery  1 , R Walton, A Coulson, D Glasspool, S Ziebland, J Fox
Affiliations

Computer support for recording and interpreting family histories of breast and ovarian cancer in primary care (RAGs): qualitative evaluation with simulated patients

J Emery et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objectives: To explore general practitioners' attitudes towards and use of a computer program for assessing genetic risk of cancer in primary care.

Design: Qualitative analysis of semistructured interviews and video recordings of simulated consultations.

Participants: Purposive sample of 15 general practitioners covering a range of computer literacy, interest in genetics, age, and sex.

Interventions: Each doctor used the program in two consultations in which an actor played a woman concerned about her family history of cancer. Consultations were videotaped and followed by interviews with the video as a prompt to questioning. MAIN OUTCOME MESURESs: Use of computer program in the Consultation.

Results: The program was viewed as an appropriate application of information technology because of the complexity of cancer genetics and a sense of "guideline chaos" in primary care. Doctors found the program easy to use, but it often affected their control of the consultation. They needed to balance their desire to share the computer screen with the patient, driven by their concerns about the effect of the computer on doctor-patient communication, against the risk of premature disclosure of bad news.

Conclusions: This computer program could provide the necessary support to assist assessment of genetic risk of cancer in primary care. The potential impact of computer software on the consultation should not be underestimated. This study highlights the need for careful evaluation when developing medical information systems.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Kinmonth AL, Reinhard J, Bobrow M, Pauker S. The new genetics: implications for clinical services in Britain and the United States. BMJ. 1998;316:767–770. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harris R, Harris H. Primary care for patients at genetic risk. BMJ. 1995;311:275–276. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fry A, Campbell H, Gudmundsdottir H, Rush R, Porteous M, Gorman D, et al. General practitioners’ views on their role in cancer genetics and current practice. Fam Pract (in press). - PubMed
    1. Harris R, Harris H. Genetics in primary care. Report on workshop of EC Concerted Action on Genetic Services in Europe (CAGSE) in association with the RCGP Spring meeting, Blackpool, UK, 28 April 1995. J Med Genet. 1996;33:346–348. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Occasional paper 77. Genetics in primary care. North West England faculty of the RCGP. A report from the Faculty Genetics Group. London: Royal College of General Practitioners; 1998. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types