Experience with procedural sedation in a pediatric burn center
- PMID: 10392912
- DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3468(99)90767-4
Experience with procedural sedation in a pediatric burn center
Abstract
Background: Burn care requires daily debridement, dressing changes, and assessment regarding the need for skin grafting. These procedures are painful and may require an operating room environment.
Methods: The authors reviewed their experience with 912 consecutive procedural sedations (PS) in 220 pediatric burn patients over a 2-year period to identify what influence PS had on patient care. Median patient age was 32 months, and body surface area burn was 7.2%+/-6%. Pharmacological techniques included oral and intravenous medications and N2O. The authors included all sedations given in the burn treatment area and excluded all treatments given in the intensive care unit or emergency unit.
Results: PS allowed for early aggressive wound debridement, virtually eliminated the need for operating room debridement (used in only 22 patients), and eliminated patient discomfort and fear often associated with subsequent debridements. Burn wound-related complications occurred in 54 patients and included wound infection (n = 18), graft loss (n = 9), and pneumonia (n = 4). The incidence of PS complications was 7% with the most common problems including decreased arterial saturation (n = 41), emesis (n = 11), and agitation (n = 8). No patient required intubation or transfer to an intensive care unit bed. The average length of stay (LOS) for all patients was 8.7+/-6.2 days, and 6.2+/-3.8 days in the 200 patients not admitted to the intensive care unit. This compares favorably with the 9.5-day LOS of patients treated in 1990.
Conclusions: PS in burn patients allows for early aggressive debridement, decreases the use of the operating room for debridement, and a decrease in length of stay when compared with our previous burn patients. PS has a modest risk of complications, enhances the family's cooperation and satisfaction with health care provided, and should be an integral part of burn care in children.
Similar articles
-
Negative pressure dressing assisted healing in pediatric burn patients.J Pediatr Surg. 2014 Jul;49(7):1142-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.02.040. Epub 2014 Feb 17. J Pediatr Surg. 2014. PMID: 24952804
-
Evolving treatment in a decade of pediatric burn care.J Pediatr Surg. 2004 Jun;39(6):957-60; discussion 957-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2004.04.001. J Pediatr Surg. 2004. PMID: 15185233 Review.
-
A retrospective review of the burn intensive care unit admissions for a year.J Burn Care Rehabil. 1995 Jan-Feb;16(1):56-8. doi: 10.1097/00004630-199501000-00010. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1995. PMID: 7721910
-
Application of hydrosurgery for burn wound debridement: An 8-year cohort analysis.Burns. 2019 Feb;45(1):88-96. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.08.015. Epub 2018 Oct 12. Burns. 2019. PMID: 30322740
-
Emergent burn care.South Med J. 1984 Feb;77(2):204-14. doi: 10.1097/00007611-198402000-00019. South Med J. 1984. PMID: 6367073 Review.
Cited by
-
Management of Traumatic Wounds and a Novel Approach to Delivering Wound Care in Children.Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2014 Apr 1;3(4):335-343. doi: 10.1089/wound.2013.0465. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2014. PMID: 24761364 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Considerations for pediatric burn sedation and analgesia.Burns Trauma. 2017 Oct 16;5:28. doi: 10.1186/s41038-017-0094-8. eCollection 2017. Burns Trauma. 2017. PMID: 29051890 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Significant chemical burns associated with dermal exposure to laundry pod detergent.J Med Toxicol. 2014 Sep;10(3):292-4. doi: 10.1007/s13181-014-0387-2. J Med Toxicol. 2014. PMID: 24526400 Free PMC article.
-
A pediatric acute wound service: a novel approach in wound management.J Pediatr Surg. 2010 Jan;45(1):167-70; discussion 170. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.10.031. J Pediatr Surg. 2010. PMID: 20105599 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical