Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1999 Jul;70(1):97-103.
doi: 10.1093/ajcn/70.1.97.

Effect of a lifestyle intervention on bone mineral density in premenopausal women: a randomized trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Effect of a lifestyle intervention on bone mineral density in premenopausal women: a randomized trial

L M Salamone et al. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999 Jul.

Abstract

Background: The positive association between body weight and bone mineral density (BMD) is well documented; in contrast, the effect of changes in body weight on BMD is not well understood, particularly, in normal-weight populations.

Objective: We examined the effect of a lifestyle intervention aimed at lowering dietary fat intake and increasing physical activity to produce modest weight loss or prevent weight gain on BMD in a population of 236 healthy, premenopausal women aged 44-50 y.

Design: All women were participating in a clinical trial known as The Women's Healthy Lifestyle Project and were randomly assigned to intervention or control groups. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of BMD at the lumbar spine and proximal femur were made before and after 18 mo of participation in the trial.

Results: The intervention group (n = 115) experienced a mean (+/-SD) weight loss of 3.2 +/- 4.7 kg over the 18 mo compared with a weight gain of 0.42 +/- 3.6 kg in the control group (n = 121) (P < 0.001). The annualized rate of hip BMD loss was 2-fold higher (P < 0.015) in the intervention group (0.81 +/- 1.3%) than in the control group (0.42 +/- 1.1%); a similar, although nonsignificant pattern was observed for the loss in spine BMD: 0.70 +/- 1.4% and 0.37 +/- 1.5% (P = 0.093) in the intervention and control groups, respectively. Large increases in physical activity attenuated spine BMD loss, but had no significant effect on BMD loss at the hip.

Conclusions: The intervention group, who modified their lifestyle to lose weight, had a higher rate of BMD loss at the hip and lumbar spine than did the weight-stable control group. Recommendations for weight loss must be made with consideration that such an endorsement may result in BMD loss.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types