Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1999 Jul;116(1):13-24.
doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70298-2.

Cephalometric changes after the correction of class III malocclusion with maxillary expansion/facemask therapy

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Cephalometric changes after the correction of class III malocclusion with maxillary expansion/facemask therapy

K E Macdonald et al. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999 Jul.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the cephalometric changes that occurred during and after the correction of Class III malocclusion. The records of 24 Class III patients treated with a banded expansion appliance and custom facemask were compared with 24 Class I and 27 Class III untreated controls. Cephalometric means were calculated for the annualized data and compared univariately with unpaired t tests to determine significant differences. Treatment results showed more convexity of the facial profile from anterior displacement and downward and backward rotation of the maxilla and clockwise rotation of the mandible. The maxillary teeth moved forward while the lower incisors retruded. Postprotraction results showed the maxilla did not relapse after treatment but grew anteriorly similar to the Class III controls but less than the Class I controls. Mandibular growth was similar for the treatment and control groups. Dental changes compensated for decreasing overjet whereas the soft tissue profile showed no significant posttreatment changes. Results in the intercontrol comparison showed the Class III controls had significantly less forward movement of A-point and greater forward movement of the mandible than Class I controls. Because of these differences using a Class I control group to compare to a Class III treatment group will tend to underestimate the treatment effects and overestimate posttreatment changes. Overcorrection of the Class III malocclusion is recommended to compensate for postprotraction growth deficiency of the maxilla.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources