Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1999 Jul;12(3):394-404.
doi: 10.1128/CMR.12.3.394.

Acquisition, transport, and storage of iron by pathogenic fungi

Affiliations
Review

Acquisition, transport, and storage of iron by pathogenic fungi

D H Howard. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1999 Jul.

Abstract

Iron is required by most living systems. A great variety of means of acquisition, avenues of uptake, and methods of storage are used by pathogenic fungi to ensure a supply of the essential metal. Solubilization of insoluble iron polymers is the first step in iron assimilation. The two methods most commonly used by microorganisms for solubilization of iron are reduction and chelation. Reduction of ferric iron to ferrous iron by enzymatic or nonenzymatic means is a common mechanism among pathogenic yeasts. Under conditions of iron starvation, many fungi synthesize iron chelators known as siderophores. Two classes of compounds that function in iron gathering are commonly observed: hydroxamates and polycarboxylates. Two major responses to iron stress in fungi are a high-affinity ferric iron reductase and siderophore synthesis. Regulation of these two mechanisms at the molecular level has received attention. Uptake of siderophores is a diverse process, which varies among the different classes of compounds. Since free iron is toxic, it must be stored for further metabolic use. Polyphosphates, ferritins, and siderophores themselves have been described as storage molecules. The iron-gathering mechanisms used by a pathogen in an infected host are largely unknown and can only be posited on the basis of in vitro studies at present.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1
FIG. 1
Representative hydroxamate siderophores. Adapted from reference with permission of the publisher.
FIG. 2
FIG. 2
The polycarboxylate rhizoferrin. Adapted from reference with permission of the publisher.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adjimani J P, Owusu E. Nonenzymatic NADH/FMN-dependent reduction of ferric siderophores. J Inorg Biochem. 1997;66:247–252.
    1. An Z, Mei B, Yuan W M, Leong S A. The distal GATA sequences of the sid1 promoter of Ustilago maydis mediate iron repression of siderophore production and interact directly with Urbs1, a GATA family transcription factor. EMBO J. 1997;16:1742–1750. - PMC - PubMed
    1. An Z, Zhao Q, McEvoy J, Yuan W M, Markley J L, Leong S A. The second finger of Urbs1 is required for iron-mediated repression of sid1 in Ustilago maydis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:5882–5887. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ardon O, Nudelman R, Caris C, Libman J, Shanzer A, Chen Y, Hadar Y. Iron uptake in Ustilago maydis: tracking the iron path. J Bacteriol. 1998;180:2021–2026. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ardon O, Weizman H, Libman J, Shanzer A, Chen Y, Hadar Y. Iron uptake in Ustilago maydis: studies with fluorescent ferrichrome analogues. Microbiology. 1997;143:3625–3631. - PubMed

Publication types