Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1999 May;8(3):242-53.

The influence of sizing on the dynamic function of the free-hand implanted porcine aortic homograft: an in vitro study

Affiliations
  • PMID: 10399656

The influence of sizing on the dynamic function of the free-hand implanted porcine aortic homograft: an in vitro study

M J Thubrikar et al. J Heart Valve Dis. 1999 May.

Abstract

Background and aims of the study: The influence of sizing on the function of a porcine aortic valve after its implantation using the free-hand technique in the subcoronary position was investigated.

Methods: Dynamic function and leaflet configuration of the valve (n = 16) were first analyzed in its natural aortic root in a left heart simulator at 120/80 mmHg pressure and 4 l/min cardiac output. The valve was then implanted in the recipient porcine aortic root and re-studied. Three groups were investigated: group I (n = 4) comprised of 1-2 mm smaller donor aortic valve than the recipient; group II (n = 8) 3-4 mm smaller; and group III (n = 4) 5-7 mm smaller. Orifice area (OA), systolic and diastolic configurations of the leaflets, pattern and timing of leaflet opening and closure, commissural movement, pressure gradient and valvular regurgitation were analyzed.

Results: In the intact donor aortic root, average expansion of the aorta at the commissures, for a pressure change from 0 to 80 mmHg, was about 42%. This was reduced significantly in all assemblies. Group I showed a 34% reduction in OA, and excessive leaflet bending; there was no aortic insufficiency (AI) or pressure gradient across the valve. In group III there was a lesser reduction in OA and reduced leaflet bending, but two of four valves had AI. In group II, the reduction in OA was only 13%, there was less leaflet bending, and no AI.

Conclusions: The donor valve 3-4 mm smaller than the recipient seems an optimal match. The current practice of using the same size donor as recipient may be responsible for excessive leaflet bending and may be implicated in early deterioration of the homograft.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources