The polar average reference effect: a bias in estimating the head surface integral in EEG recording
- PMID: 10402104
- DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(99)00044-9
The polar average reference effect: a bias in estimating the head surface integral in EEG recording
Abstract
A reference-independent measure of potential is helpful for studying the multichannel EEG. The potentials integrated over the surface of the body is a constant, i.e. inactive across time, regardless of the activity and distribution of brain electric sources. Therefore, the average reference, the mean of all recording channels at each time point, may be used to approximate an inactive reference. However, this approximation is valid only with accurate spatial sampling of the scalp fields. Accurate sampling requires a sufficient electrode density and full coverage of the head's surface. If electrodes are concentrated in one region of the surface, such as just on the scalp, then the average is biased toward that region. Differences from the average will then be smaller in the center of the region, e.g. the vertex, than at the periphery. In this paper, we illustrate how this polar average reference effect (PARE) may be created by both the inadequate density and the uneven distribution of EEG electrodes. The greater the coverage of the surface of the volume conductor, the more the average reference approaches the ideal inactive reference.
Similar articles
-
Is the Surface Potential Integral of a Dipole in a Volume Conductor Always Zero? A Cloud Over the Average Reference of EEG and ERP.Brain Topogr. 2017 Mar;30(2):161-171. doi: 10.1007/s10548-016-0543-x. Epub 2017 Feb 14. Brain Topogr. 2017. PMID: 28194613 Free PMC article.
-
A method to standardize a reference of scalp EEG recordings to a point at infinity.Physiol Meas. 2001 Nov;22(4):693-711. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/22/4/305. Physiol Meas. 2001. PMID: 11761077 Review.
-
Spherical splines and average referencing in scalp electroencephalography.Brain Topogr. 2006 Winter;19(1-2):43-52. doi: 10.1007/s10548-006-0011-0. Brain Topogr. 2006. PMID: 17019635
-
Optimal reference electrode selection for electric source imaging.Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1996 Aug;99(2):163-73. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(96)95139-1. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1996. PMID: 8761052
-
Issues and considerations for using the scalp surface Laplacian in EEG/ERP research: A tutorial review.Int J Psychophysiol. 2015 Sep;97(3):189-209. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.04.012. Epub 2015 Apr 25. Int J Psychophysiol. 2015. PMID: 25920962 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Differentiating amodal familiarity from modality-specific memory processes: an ERP study.Psychophysiology. 2003 Nov;40(6):979-88. doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.00116. Psychophysiology. 2003. PMID: 14986851 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
What's in a name? Brain activity reveals categorization processes differ across languages.Hum Brain Mapp. 2010 Nov;31(11):1786-801. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20974. Hum Brain Mapp. 2010. PMID: 20957725 Free PMC article.
-
Hearing the Sound in the Brain: Influences of Different EEG References.Front Neurosci. 2018 Mar 13;12:148. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00148. eCollection 2018. Front Neurosci. 2018. PMID: 29593487 Free PMC article.
-
Deviant ERP response to spoken non-words among adolescents exposed to cocaine in utero.Brain Lang. 2012 Mar;120(3):209-16. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.09.002. Epub 2011 Oct 5. Brain Lang. 2012. PMID: 21978844 Free PMC article.
-
The Neural Signatures of Processing Semantic End Values in Automatic Number Comparisons.Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Nov 27;9:645. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00645. eCollection 2015. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015. PMID: 26640436 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources