Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1999:19 Suppl 2:S462-6.

The optimal approach to peritoneal dialysis prescription in children

M Fischbach  1 , J Terzic, V Bergère, C Gaugler, E Provot
Affiliations
  • PMID: 10406565
Review

The optimal approach to peritoneal dialysis prescription in children

M Fischbach et al. Perit Dial Int. 1999.

Abstract

Objective: To describe the optimal approach to peritoneal dialysis (PD) prescription in children.

Design: Review of the available literature.

Results: Unlike the situation in adults, the main method used for PD in children is automated peritoneal dialysis (APD). The prone position, while resting, permits the dialysis prescription to use a higher fill volume (IPV), as in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD), and is also probably more effective than PD in an upright position. However, because APD is limited to 10 hours, the dialytic effectiveness of nocturnal APD should avoid two potential risks: (1) use of too high an IPV per exchange, inducing lymphatic reabsorption, a factor in unsuitable water and sodium balance [Fischbach M. Peritoneal dialysis prescription for neonates. Perit Dial Int. 1996; 16(Suppl):S52-4]; and (2) use of too short a dwell time per exchange, limiting the purification of creatinine and phosphate despite an apparently adequate urea purification (Malhotra C, Murota GH, Tzamaloukas AH. Creatinine clearance and urea clearance in PD: What to do in case of discrepancy. Perit Dial Int. 1997; 17:532-5).

PubMed Disclaimer