Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1999 Jul 17;319(7203):188-9.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7203.188b.

Chlamydia screening can have high take-up rates if right methodology is used

J Macleod, G D Smith

Chlamydia screening can have high take-up rates if right methodology is used

J Macleod et al. BMJ. .
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. CMO’s Expert Advisory Group. Chlamydia trachomatis. London: Department of Health; 1998.
    1. Duncan B, Hart G. Sexuality and health: the hidden costs of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis. BMJ. 1999;318:931–933. . (3 April.) - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abter EIM, Mahmud MA. Screening for chlamydia to prevent pelvic inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1531. - PubMed
    1. Grun L, Tassano-Smith J, Carder C, Johnson AM, Robinson A, Murray E, et al. Comparison of two methods of screening for genital chlamydial infection in women attending in general practice: cross sectional survey. BMJ. 1997;315:226–230. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Macleod J, Rowsell R, Horner P, Crowley T, Caul EO, Low N, et al. Postal urine specimens: are they a feasible method for genital chlamydial infection screening? Br J Gen Pract (in press). - PMC - PubMed