Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1999;7(4):254-66.
doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1999)7:4<254::AID-HBM4>3.0.CO;2-G.

Nonlinear spatial normalization using basis functions

Affiliations

Nonlinear spatial normalization using basis functions

J Ashburner et al. Hum Brain Mapp. 1999.

Abstract

We describe a comprehensive framework for performing rapid and automatic nonlabel-based nonlinear spatial normalizations. The approach adopted minimizes the residual squared difference between an image and a template of the same modality. In order to reduce the number of parameters to be fitted, the nonlinear warps are described by a linear combination of low spatial frequency basis functions. The objective is to determine the optimum coefficients for each of the bases by minimizing the sum of squared differences between the image and template, while simultaneously maximizing the smoothness of the transformation using a maximum a posteriori (MAP) approach. Most MAP approaches assume that the variance associated with each voxel is already known and that there is no covariance between neighboring voxels. The approach described here attempts to estimate this variance from the data, and also corrects for the correlations between neighboring voxels. This makes the same approach suitable for the spatial normalization of both high-quality magnetic resonance images, and low-resolution noisy positron emission tomography images. A fast algorithm has been developed that utilizes Taylor's theorem and the separable nature of the basis functions, meaning that most of the nonlinear spatial variability between images can be automatically corrected within a few minutes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Amit Y, Grenander U, Piccioni M. 1991. Structural image restoration through deformable templates. J Am Stat Assoc 86:376–387.
    1. Ashburner J, Friston KJ. 1997. Multimodal image coregistration and partitioning—a unified framework. Neuroimage 6:209–217. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/htbin-post/Entrez/query?uid=98008829&form... - PubMed
    1. Ashburner J, Neelin P, Collins DL, Evans AC, Friston KJ. 1997. Incorporating prior knowledge into image registration. Neuroimage 6:344–352. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/htbin-post/Entrez/query?uid=98080657&form... - PubMed
    1. Bookstein FL. 1989. Principal warps: thin‐plate splines and the decomposition of deformations. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intelligence 11:567–585.
    1. Bookstein FL. 1997a. Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: morphometrics of group differences in outline shape. Med Image Anal 1:225–243. - PubMed

Publication types